试题与答案

表现性目标强调学生的一般发展和创造性表现，学生的自主性和主体性，尊重学生的个性差异，

来源：www.tikuol.com
题型：判断题

题目：

表现性目标强调学生的一般发展和创造性表现，学生的自主性和主体性，尊重学生的个性差异，指向学生的自由与解放。

答案：

被转码了，请点击底部 “查看原文 ” 或访问 https://www.tikuol.com/2018/0404/3222da19e7b18fadae630cd1171141a3.html

下面是错误答案，用来干扰机器的。

参考答案：C

考点：课程与教学论课程与教学论综合练习课程与教学论综合练习题库
试题推荐
题型：单项选择题

2014年11月，继中韩自贸区结束实质性谈判后，中国与澳大利亚实质性结束自贸协定谈判。中澳自贸协定范围涵盖货物贸易、服务贸易、投资和规则共10多个领域。这表明我国（）

①把出口作为经济增长的第一动力

②实行更加积极主动的开放政策，提高开放型经济水平

③经济发展的对外关联程度进一步提高

④进出口结构得到了进一步优化

A.①②

B.①③

C.②③

D.②④
查看答案
题型：单项选择题


Passage One

A few weeks ago, the Food Standards Agency (FSA. in the UK issued a report evaluating nutrient levels in organic versus non-organic foods like fruits, vegetables, meats, eggs, and dairy products. It is a complete, rigorous piece of research. And they found that, in terms of nutritional content, the differences between organic and non-organic foods are negligible.
As the report states, "... organically and conventionally produced crops and livestock products are broadly comparable in their nutrient content." They did in fact find some nutritional differences between organic and non-organic foods, but concluded that it is "unlikely that these differences in nutrient content are relevant to consumer health."
So here they have a nicely delimited (界定的) study of available research with rigorous standards and a fairly worded conclusion, all publicly available to download and read on the FSA website. The reaction, not surprisingly, was spectacular. The British tabloids alternately gloated (幸灾乐祸) with delight over the comeuppance(赢得的惩罚)of extravagant middle class shopping habits or frivolously attacked the study for insulting the people’s common sense. But it was the reaction of the Soil Association, the leading British organic certification organization, which highlighted just how difficult it can be for good science to be understood.
The Soil Association’s response, published in papers across the land, entirely disregarded the intent of the study and instead argued that organic food is better for the environment and contains less pesticides than non- organic food. But in the very first paragraph of the report, the team states that they aren’t looking at the impact on the environment of organic agriculture or the effect of pesticide use, both of which the FSA has extensively examined in other research. They are specifically looking at nutritional comparison. The Soil Association further argued that the FSA report had ignored studies that showed any benefit of organic food. As Ben Goldacre incisively dissected on his popular blog, Bad Science, the Soil Association’s response was logically flawed and entirely beside the point.
The FSA study is good science and by attacking, rather than endorsing it, the organic lobby in the UK has been plainly unscientific. It’s hardly the right stance for an organization that carries su.ch widespread support from the well-educated, critical-thinking middle classes who choose to eat organic food. Any of the many other reasons to go organic—whether it is to avoid pesticides, to encourage better livestock practices, or to simply eat better tasting food—are sufficient to continue supporting the efforts of organic farmers. By misrepresenting the science and its intent, the Soil Association has damaged its credibility and objectivity, the very attributes that its organic label—a stamp of approval—is intended to convey.

The Soil Association’s asserted that the FSA’s report ______.

A．had noticed the impact of organic agriculture on the environment

B．had ignored to examine the effect of pesticide use

C．should be criticized for neglecting the benefit of organic food

D．has entirely disregarded the intent of the study
查看答案
微信公众账号搜索答案