根据原文"蒸蒸发热者"当用（） A.桂枝汤 B.白虎汤 C.调胃承气汤 D.小承气汤

甲企业2011年12月1日与乙企业签订了一项购销合同，约定于2012年4月1日以3000000元（不含税）的价格向乙企业销售电脑800台，若不能按期交货，甲企业需按照总价款的1.5%支付违约金。至2011年12月31日，甲企业还未开始生产该电脑，由于原料上涨等因素，甲企业预计生产该电脑的单位成本不可避免地升至3800元，假定不考虑其他因素，2011年12月31日甲企业的下列处理中，正确的是（）。

A.确认预计负债40000元 

B.确认预计负债45000元 

C.确认存货跌价准备40000元 

D.确认存货跌价准备45000元

小儿急性白血病治疗的关键是（）

A.支持疗法

B.联合疗法

C.放射治疗

D.免疫治疗

E.骨髓移植

根据车船税暂行条例的规定，以下各项中，属于车船税纳税人的有( )。

A．事业单位

B．外商投资企业

C．华侨

D．私营企业

男性，43岁，3天前头部外伤，当时无意识障碍，2小时后出现头痛，抬高头位时加剧，伴恶心、呕吐，平卧后可减轻。查体无阳性体征，头颅CT未见异常。

诊断考虑（）

A.良性颅内压增高

B.外伤后低颅压综合征

C.脑震荡

D.神经性头痛

E.脑挫裂伤

There are countless parents who will not allow their children to play violent video games, in which players are able to kill, maim, dismember or sexually assault human images in depraved ways. The video game industry rates them, and some stores use that rating to decide whether to sell a particular game to a minor.

But California went too far in 2005 when it made it illegal to sell violent video games to minors. Retailers challenged the law, and a federal appeals court rightly ruled that it violates the First Amendment. Last week, the Supreme Court said that it would review that decision. We hope it agrees that the law is unconstitutional. California’s law imposes fines of up to $1,000 on retailers that sell violent video games to anyone under 18. To qualify, a game must, as a whole, lack serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value for minors.

But video games are a form of free expression. Many have elaborate plots and characters, often drawn from fiction or history. The California law is a content-based restriction, something that is presumed invalid under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court has made it clear that minors have First Amendment rights. California has tried to lower the constitutional standard for upholding the law by comparing it to "variable obscenity," a First Amendment principle that allows banning the sale of some sexually explicit materials to minors that cannot be banned for adults. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, like other federal courts, rightly refused to extend that doctrine to violent games.

Under traditional First Amendment analysis, content-based speech restrictions can survive only if they are narrowly tailored to promote a compelling government interest. California says its interest is in preventing psychological or neurological damage to young people. The appeals court concluded that the evidence connecting violent video games to this sort of damage is too weak to make restricting the games a compelling government interest.

Even if the interest were legitimate, the state could have used less restrictive methods. The video game industry, like the movie business, has a voluntary rating system that provides buyers and sellers with information on the content of specific games, including age-specific ratings, ranging from "early childhood" to "adults only. " The government could do more to promote the use of voluntary ratings by retailers and parents.

California lawmakers may have been right when they decided that video games in which players kill and maim are not the most socially beneficial form of expression. The Constitution, however, does not require speech to be ideal for it to be protected.

The author’s attitude toward California’s law is（）

A. critical

B. defensive

C. ironical

D. objective