华平3G单兵接入图像综合管理平台，有哪几种接入模式（）A、设备模式 B、对讲模式 C、双

把一张纸对折5次后，用针扎一个孔，将其展开，这张纸上共有______个小孔．

受累节段的硬化，相应的肾小管萎缩、肾间质纤维化

A.微小病变型肾病

B.系膜增生性肾小球肾炎

C.系膜毛细血管性肾小球肾炎

D.膜性肾病

E.局灶性节段性肾小球硬化

女性，70岁，行右乳癌改良根治术，肿物直径3cm，右腋下淋巴结可见癌转移1/15，雌激素、孕激素受体均为阳性，胸片、腹部B超、骨扫描均未见异常。

患者的临床分期为（）

A.0期

B.Ⅰ期

C.Ⅱ期

D.Ⅲ期

E.Ⅳ期

患者女，44岁，已婚。3个月来一直情绪低落，做什么事都没有兴趣，没有愉快感。非常容易疲劳，家务也懒得做，整天想躺在床上，但睡不着。晚上很难入睡，常常半夜醒来，再睡困难。食欲没有，不想吃饭，不肯吃饭，认为“自己吃下去没有排出来，没有饥饿感，肠子和胃都没有了。一切都是空的，人也空的，行尸走肉，死掉算了！”动作行为明显减少、抑制。常常念叨“对不起家人，拖累家人。

该患者可能的综合征是（）

A.Capgras综合征

B.Cotard综合征

C.Ganser综合征

D.Korsakoff综合征

E.Κандинскй-Clèrambault综合征

Come on—Everybody’s doing it. That whispered message, half invitation and half forcing, is what most of us think of when we hear the words peer pressure. It usually leads to no good—drinking, drugs and casual sex. But in her new book Join the Club, Tina Rosenberg contends that peer pressure can also be a positive force through what she calls the social cure, in which organizations and officials use the power of group dynamics to help individuals improve their lives and possibly the word.

Rosenberg, the recipient of a Pulitzer Prize, offers a host of examples of the social cure in action: In South Carolina, a state-sponsored antismoking program called Rage Against the Haze sets out to make cigarettes uncool. In South Africa, an HIV-prevention initiative known as LoveLife recruits young people to promote safe sex among their peers.

The idea seems promising, and Rosenberg is a perceptive observer. Her critique of the lameness of many pubic-health campaigns is spot-on: they fail to mobilize peer pressure for healthy habits, and they demonstrate a seriously flawed understanding of psychology. "Dare to be different, please don’t smoke!" pleads one billboard campaign aimed at reducing smoking among teenagers teenagers, who desire nothing more than fitting in. Rosenberg argues convincingly that public-health advocates ought to take a page from advertisers, so skilled at applying peer pressure.

But on the general effectiveness of the social cure, Rosenberg is less persuasive. Join the Club is filled with too much irrelevant detail and not enough exploration of the social and biological factors that make peer pressure so powerful. The most glaring flaw of the social cure as it’s presented here is that it doesn’t work very well for very long. Rage Against the Haze failed once state funding was cut. Evidence that the LoveLife program produces lasting changes is limited and mixed.

There’s no doubt that our peer groups exert enormous influence on our behavior. An emerging body of research shows that positive health habits—as well as negative ones—spread through networks of friends via social communication. This is a subtle form of peer pressure: we unconsciously imitate the behavior we see every day.

Far less certain, however, is how successfully experts and bureaucrats can select our peer groups and steer their activities in virtuous directions. It’s like the teacher who breaks up the troublemakers in the back row by pairing them with better-behaved classmates. The tactic never really works. And that’s the problem with a social cure engineered from the outside: in the real world, as in school, we insist on choosing our own friends.

In the author’s view, Rosenberg’s book fails to（）

A. adequately probe social and biological factors

B. effectively evade the flaws of the social cure

C. illustrate the functions of state funding

D. produce a long-lasting social effect