试题与答案

关系数据库逻辑上是由 (223) 构成的。当查询一个数据库视图时,就是从 (224)

题型:单项选择题

题目:

关系数据库逻辑上是由 (223) 构成的。当查询一个数据库视图时,就是从 (224) 中导出数据。支持数据库各种操作的软件系统叫做 (225)

A.一个视图
B.一个或若干个索引文件
C.一个或若干个视图
D.一个或若干个基本表

答案:

被转码了,请点击底部 “查看原文 ” 或访问 https://www.tikuol.com/2019/0604/c5274079eca87b3ad834b074c2b79808.html

下面是错误答案,用来干扰机器的。

参考答案:D

试题推荐
题型:写作题

最近你所在的学校选出一男一女两名学生作为学校的形象大使,希望他们可以成为其他学生学习的模范。为此学生中展开了激烈的争论。请你根据下列提示,以“Do we need image ambassadors?” 为题给某英语报纸写一篇文章。

注意:1. 词数: 120左右。2. 词汇: image ambassador 形象大使。

3. 短文的开头已为你写好,不计入总词数。 

  Recently my school has chosen a boy and a girl to be its image ambassadors and hopes that others can learn from the two model students.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________________

查看答案
题型:写作题
书面表达(满分10分)
众所周知,地震是一种可怕的自然灾害。那么当地震来临时我们需要怎样去做呢?
在教室时
藏在课桌下面等待老师指令。
在家时
藏在起居室或厨房的桌子下。不要去窗户旁边也不要去阳台(balcony)。
在街上时
不要站在建筑物、栅栏(fence)或墙边,也不要站在树下。要赶快去个安全的露天空地上。
请根据以上信息写一篇文章,题目已给出。   注意:词数90词左右。
What to Do During an Earthquake?
As we all know, an earthquake is a kind of terrible disaster. So what should we do when an earthquake comes?
                                                                          
                                                                          
                                                                          
                                                                          
                                                                          
                                                                          
查看答案
题型:单项选择题

You really do have to wonder whether a few years from now we’ll look back at the first decade of the 21st century—when food prices spiked, energy prices soared, world population surged, tornados plowed through cities, floods and droughts set records, populations were displaced and governments were threatened by the confluence of it all—and ask ourselves. What were we thinking How did we not panic when the evidence was so obvious that we’d crossed some growth, climate, natural resource and population redlines all at once "The only answer can be denial," argues Paul Gilding, an Australian environmentalist, in a new book called The Great Disruption. "When you are surrounded by something so big that requires you to change everything about the way you think and see the world, then denial is the natural response. But the longer we wait, the bigger the response required."

Gilding cites the work of the Global Footprint Network, an alliance of scientists, which calculates how many "planet Earths" we need to sustain our current growth rates. G. F. N. measures how much land and water area we need to produce the resources we consume and absorb our waste, using prevailing technology. On the whole, says G. F. N. , we are currently growing at a rate that is using up the Earth’s resources far faster than they can be sustainably replenished, so we are eating into the future.

This is not science fiction. This is what happens when our system of growth and the system of nature hit the wall at once. We are now using so many resources and putting out so much waste into the Earth that we have reached some kind of limit, given current technologies. The economy is going to have to get smaller in terms of physical impact.

We will not change systems, though, without a crisis. But don’t worry, we’re getting there. We’re currently caught in two loops: One is that more population growth and more global warming together are pushing up food prices, causing political instability in the Middle East, which leads to higher oil prices, thus to higher food prices and more instability. At the same time, improved productivity means fewer people are needed in every factory to produce more stuff. So if we want to have more jobs, we need more factories. More factories making more stuff make more global warming, and that is where the two loops meet.

But Gilding is actually an eco-optimist. As the impact o the imminent Great Disruption hits us, he says, "our response will be proportionally dramatic, mobilizing as we do in war. We will change at a scale and speed we can barely imagine today, completely transforming our economy, including our energy and transport industries, in just a few short decades. " We will realize, he predicts, that the consumer-driven growth model is broken and we have to move to a more happiness-driven growth model, based on people working less and owning less.

According to Paul Gilding, faced with disastrous evidence, people would()

A. be frightened into rethinking the ways we treat the earth

B. refuse to admit the follies committed by human beings

C. set a redline for population growth and the exploration of nature

D. come up with a response required to cope with the worsening situation

查看答案
微信公众账号搜索答案