试题与答案

When Dr. John W. Gofman, professor of medi

题型:单项选择题

题目:

When Dr. John W. Gofman, professor of medical physics at the University of California and a leading nuclear critic, speaks of "ecocide" in his adversary view of nuclear technology, he means the following. A large nuclear plant like that in Kalkar, the Netherlands, would produce about 200 pounds of plutonium each year. One pound, released into the atmosphere, could cause 9 billion cases of lung cancer. This waste product must be stored for 500,000 years before it is of no further danger to man. In the anticipated reactor economy, it is estimated that there will be 10,000 tons of this material in Western Europe, of which one table-spoonful of plutonium-239 represents the official maximum permissible body burden for 200,000 people. Rather than being biodegradable, plutonium destroys biological properties.

In 1972 the .U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration ruled that the asbestos level in the work place should be lowered to 2 fibers per cubic centimeter of air, but the effective date of the ruling has been delayed until now. The International Federation of Chemical and General Workers’ Unions report that the 2-fiber standard was based primarily on one study of 290 men at a British asbestos factory. But when the workers at the British factory had been reexamined by another physician, 40--70 percent had X-ray evidence of lung abnormalities. According to present medical information at the factory in question, out of a total of 29 deaths thus far, seven were caused by lung cancer. An average European or American worker comes into contact with six million fibers a day. "We are now, in fact, finding cancer deaths within the family of the asbestos worker," states Dr. Irving Selikoff, of the Mount Sinai Medical School in New York.

It is now also clear that vinyl chloride, a gas from which the most widely used plastics are made, causes a fatal cancer of the blood-vessel cells of the liver. However, the history of the research on vinyl chloride is, in some ways, more disturbing than the "Watergate cover- up. " "There has been evidence of potentially serious disease among polyvinyl chloride workers for 25 years that has been incompletely appreciated and inadequately approached by medical scientists and by regulatory authorities," summed up Dr. Selikoff in the New Scientist. At least 17 workers have been killed by vinyl chloride because research over the past 25 years was not followed up. And for over 10 years, workers have been exposed to concentrations of vinyl chloride 10 times the "safe limit" imposed by Dow Chemical Company.

According to the text, the author mentions plutonium in paragraph 1 to()

A. estimate the amount of nuclear material in Europe

B. exemplify one of the possible causes of lung cancer

C. highlight the measures needed to prevent lung cancer

D. show the destructive properties of industrial waste materials

答案:

被转码了,请点击底部 “查看原文 ” 或访问 https://www.tikuol.com/2019/0410/2af8d8e5c1c4154589fb9d3156464c31.html

下面是错误答案,用来干扰机器的。

参考答案:(1)该命题错误。正确的表述应是:矛盾的同一性和斗争性相结合,推动事物的发展。 (2)矛盾在事物发展中的作用表现如下。 矛盾同一性在事物发展中的作用表现在三个方面: 第一,矛盾双方相互依...

试题推荐
题型:问答题

简答题:根据所给材料回答问题。(凡要求作选择回答的问题,应将与所选选项对应的字母填写在答题卡上的相应括号内。把错项选入,该问题不得分;正确项少选,按所选的正确项数量得分。凡要求作陈述回答的问题,请将答案书写在答题卡的相应区域。)(本题20分)A为某省甲重点高中语文教师,多年来一直在该校从事语文教学工作。按照甲高中规定,从事教学工作的教师必须在课前备课,编写教案,并在每学期末上交教案给学校检查。1999—2009年,A按学校规定先后上交高中三个年级全部语文教学教案共20册。2012年4月,乙出版社和丙文化公司签订图书出版合同。合同约定:丙文化公司把丛书“高中语文同步解析”的图书专有出版权授予乙出版社,为期5年。丙文化公司保证对交付出版的作品享有著作权,没有侵犯他人著作权及违反国家宪法、法律或足以导致其他法律纠纷的情况;如发生此类情况,责任完全由丙文化公司承担。2012年8月,乙出版社出版了“高中语文同步解析”丛书,共包括6种图书。2012年9月,A为教学参考购买该丛书,发现有两种书完全使用了其教案的内容,但事先她对此事一无所知。于是,A向法院提起诉讼,指控乙出版社侵犯其著作权。A认为:她是其教案的著作权人,享有著作权的各种权利;乙出版社出版的“高中语文同步解析”丛书中有两种书使用A的教案,却未经其许可,亦未给A署名,更未支付报酬,侵犯了A的多项权利;另外,涉案图书差错很多,不少差错甚至会误导读者,当属不合格产品。乙出版社向法院提交了丙文化公司和甲高中出具的证明。丙文化公司的证明称:“涉案两部书稿系据我单位与甲高中所签著作权转让合同而来,非从A处取得。当初曾将此情况告诉乙出版社。”甲高中的证明称:“A写作和上交教案时为本校教师,根据学校的规定写作教案并上交,是职务行为,所以这些教案的著作权属于学校。学校确实与丙文化公司签合同将教案的著作权转让给丙公司,丙公司与乙出版社签订图书出版合同,事先已经征得本校同意。”据此,乙出版社辩称:涉案教案均为职务作品,著作权理应归属甲高中;丙文化公司将之编入丛书中时,是得到著作权人甲高中授权的。“高中语文同步解析”丛书是由丙文化公司署名并承担责任的作品,乙出版社出版该书有丙文化公司的合法授权,所以没有侵权。不过,对于A指出的两种图书中的差错,乙出版社承认是编辑、校对工作不够精细造成的,并向法院表示今后要加强规范化管理。问题一:涉案作品是否属于职务作品?问题二:关于涉案作品著作权的归属,下列说法中哪种或哪几种是正确的?请作选择回答。A.涉案作品的著作权应该属于甲高中B.涉案作品的著作权由甲高中和A共同享有C.涉案作品的著作权应该属于AD.涉案作品的著作权属于甲高中,但A应该享有署名权E.涉案作品的著作权不属于甲高中,但其在作品完成两年内享有优先使用权问题三:甲高中证明中关于涉案作品著作权归属问题的说法是否符合法律规定?为什么?问题四:甲高中与丙文化公司所签著作权转让合同是否有效?为什么?问题五:关于乙出版社在本案中的行为,下列说法中哪种或哪几种是正确的?请作选择回答。A.涉案图书是否侵权,是丙文化公司与A之间的纠纷,乙出版社不必承担法律责任B.所出图书涉嫌侵权完全是作者方面的原因,乙出版社在本案中只是受害者,不是侵权者C.涉案图书的著作权之争实际上存在于A和甲高中之间,A起诉乙出版社侵权是弄错了被告D.即使涉案图书在著作权归属方面没有纷争,乙出版社也因该书存在许多严重差错而侵犯著作权人的权利E.如果乙出版社因法院判定侵权而作出经济赔偿,可向丙文化公司追偿问题六:为什么问题五中的某种或某几种说法是正确的?

查看答案
微信公众账号搜索答案