试题与答案

按决策问题的性质不同,决策可以分为( )。 A.风险型决策 B.长期决策 C.非确

题型:多项选择题

题目:

按决策问题的性质不同,决策可以分为( )。

A.风险型决策

B.长期决策

C.非确定型决策

D.战略决策

E.确定型决策

答案:

参考答案:A,C,E

解析: 按照决策问题的性质不同,决策可以分为确定型决策、风险型决策和非确定型决策三种。

试题推荐
题型:多项选择题

为确保消防控制室实现接受火灾报警、处置火灾信息、指挥火灾扑救、引导人员安全疏散等消防安全目标,消防控制室配备的监控设备要能够准确、规范的实施消防监控与管理等各项功能。下列关于消防控制室配备的消防设备监控功能描述中,正确的是()。

A.消防控制室设置的消防设备能够监控并显示消防设施运行状态信息,并能够向城市消防远程监控中心传输相应信息

B.根据建筑(单位)规模及其火灾危险性特点,消防控制室内需要保存必要的文字、电子资料,存储相关的消防安全管理信息,并能够及时向监控中心传输消防安全管理信息

C.大型建筑群要根据其不同建筑功能需求、火灾危险性特点和消防安全监控需要,设置两个及两个以上的消防控制室,并确定主消防控制室、分消防控制室

D.主消防控制室的消防设备能够对系统内共用消防设备进行控制,显示其状态信息,并能够显示各个分消防控制室内消防设备的状态信息,具备对分消防控制室内消防设备及其所控制的消防系统、设备的控制功能

E.各个分消防控制室的消防设备之间,可以互相传输、显示状态信息,按照重要性等方面不同可以互相控制消防设备

查看答案
题型:单项选择题

Sometimes geopolitical lessons come from the strangest places. With Eric Schmidt stepping down as CEO of Google and replaced by founder Larry Page, I can’t help but wonder if world leaders are taking note. Google perfected the horizontal business model. To the delight of enthusiasts of David Ricardo, the comparative economist, the company does one thing really well search and has built an ecosystem for others to flourish using it as a platform.

Contrast this with IBM and AT&T, long past their expiration dates as successful vertical companies. It’s no coincidence that the Soviet Union and IBM, two raging, top-down, command-and-control systems, collapsed at about the same time. What do I mean by vertical In its heyday, IBM did everything from soup to nuts. Designed chips, wrapped plastic around them, wrote operating systems and applications, and then sold and serviced mainframes. The giant captured half of computer-industry sales and 80 percent of profits until horizontal companies Intel and Microsoft knocked it out at its knees. AT&T owned phones and switches and long-distance lines until a very horizontal Internet and companies like Skype changed the economics of the phone call. These same dynamics are now driving the world economy into a productive horizontal enterprise. And it’s about time.

Economies are about increasing the standard of living of their participants. If you don’t have an economic system to create productivity, you end up stealing it from your neighbors. Think Roman Empire. Or the British who colonized large parts of the world to lock up natural resources to plug into their manufactories. Both very vertical. As of 1989, the United States of America became the world’s sole superpower. But what is America going to do with this status Unlike past empires, there’s no incentive to take over the rest of the world. Why take over a country and deal with the headaches of a welfare system, and have to fix the plumbing in Uzbekistan, when you can buy its output on the cheap, even ordering its goods over the Web Despite all the protests, globalization instills peace. Trade now represents 26 percent of world GDP, up from 18 percent in 1990.

Globalization has linked the free world in a smart horizontal alliance. Computers, cell phones, and fiber optics are not made in any single country to be exported worldwide, but instead have components and labor from more than 30 inseparable countries, including China and Vietnam. Horizontal rules!

Without much forethought or planning, the world has structured itself into a horizontal wealth-creating and peace-maintaining system—a productive system that actually increases the standard of living of all the participants, not just those in the United States. America still sits on top of the heap, sure, but wealth has increased for every country, company, and person that contributes. And they get rich not by stealing from the rest of the world, but by adding value to the food chain. Just ask Google.

It is implied in the last paragraph that Google could create miracle because()

A. it has distributed its service to every corner of the world

B. it has adapted successfully to the changed economics

C. it has helped to raise the living standards of the world

D. it has not stolen technology from the rest of the world

查看答案
微信公众账号搜索答案