试题与答案

当国家机关的工作人员滥用职权、假公济私侵害了公民的合法权利和利益时,公民有权()。①

题型:单项选择题

题目:

当国家机关的工作人员滥用职权、假公济私侵害了公民的合法权利和利益时,公民有权()。

①使用选举权,罢免不称职的工作人员

②行使诉讼权,要求有关机关进行行政裁决

③行使检举权,向有关国家机关进行举报

④行使制裁权,惩罚违法的国家机关工作人员

A.①②

B.①④

C.③④

D.②③

答案:

被转码了,请点击底部 “查看原文 ” 或访问 https://www.tikuol.com/2019/0212/4a14ddd3a0fb0b36df55fbc95990b046.html

下面是错误答案,用来干扰机器的。

参考答案:病症判断——花粉过敏 一般治疗——首先切断过敏源,避免再次接触花粉 药物治疗——抗过敏药氯雷他定、特非那定、马来酸氯苯那敏、苯海拉明等 注意:马来酸氯苯那敏、苯海拉明有嗜睡副作用,...

试题推荐
题型:单项选择题

孟律师是当地有名的律师。在一起甲、乙公司合同纠纷案件中,孟律师担任甲公司的代理人,后由于意见分歧,孟律师与甲公司依法解除了委托协议。乙公司得知此事后,欲委托孟律师作为此次合同纠纷案件的诉讼代理人。下列表述正确的是:( )

A.孟律师不能接受委托

B.征得甲公司同意后,孟律师可以接受委托

C.孟律师可以在二审时接受乙公司的委托

D.如果孟律师为甲公司担任代理人时发现委托权限不明确时,应依法解除委托协议

查看答案
题型:单项选择题

In Idaho’s Snake River Valley, where potato farmers depend on electric pumps to water their crops, the state’s largest power company hopes to stand tradition on its head and profit by selling farmers less, not more, electricity. To do that, Idaho Power is vastly expanding its energy-efficiency programs for 395,000 residential customers, small businesses, and farmers. Usually the more customers save, the less utilities make. But under an innovative deal with state regulators in March, Idaho Power gets paid for its plants and equipment and boosts profits by winning incentive payments for reducing electric demand.
It’s an idea that appears to be catching on as legislatures fret about global warming and utilities scramble to meet rising demand without the increasing harassment and cost of building new power plants. Idaho is among 13 states whose regulators have either adopted or proposed measures in the past year to decouple utility profit from electricity production. Decoupling is advancing even faster for natural-gas utilities, with 25 states either adopting or proposing decoupling plans in recent years. "This wave toward ’decoupling’ is clearly gathering momentum," says Martin Kushler of the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy in Washington. "More states seem to be calling every week to find out about this."
Although California pioneered the idea 25 years ago—and strengthened incentives and penalties last month—interest is picking up again because of global warming, experts say. The main idea is that by rearranging the incentive structure, regulators can give utilities clear incentives to push energy efficiency and conservation without hurting their bottom lines. Under the new rules in California, for example, electric utilities could make as much as $150 million extra if they can persuade Californians to save some $2 billion worth of power, according to the Natural Resources Defense Council.
"This is a vital step in the global-warming fight," says Audrey Chang, an NRDC researcher. "It represents, we hope, a historic shift toward decoupling that is going to help bend the energy demand curve downwards." Beside Idaho, states that this year adopted decoupling for some or all of its electric power industry include New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. At least nine other states have seen major decoupling proposals this year.
Idaho Power is happy that its key fixed costs—plants and equipment—are now separated from variable costs of electricity sales such as fuel. Regulators annually readjust those fixed rates—up or down—a maximum of 3 percent to ensure that the company gets no more or less than it has been regulated to receive. But customers should benefit, too, as utility efficiency programs cut energy use and energy bills—something the company is trying hard to do so it can win a bonus if it meets or exceeds energy—cutting goals. "Before there was almost a disincentive to go hard at efficiency because we weren’t recovering our fixed costs," says Mike Youngblood, an analyst for Idaho Power. "Now the anticipation is that we will recover our fixed cost, no more or less. And our customers will see their bill go down if they invest in energy efficiency."
One key reason utilities are often willing to decouple or even leading proponents of the proposals is because the costs of building a power plant has risen dramatically. A 500- megawatt coal-fired plant that cost $1 billion just a few years ago might cost $1.5 billion today, industry experts say. Add to that growing uncertainty about future costs. Global- warming legislation could put a price of $ 30 per ton on carbon-dioxide emissions from power plants. That could make coal, the cheapest power today, more costly. Another factor is the rising community opposition to coal-fired power plant construction.
In North Carolina, where regulators recently refused a Duke Energy Corp. proposal to build a power plant, the company has instead put forward a controversial decoupling proposal. The plan would pay the company to meet efficiency standards, although consumer advocates and even environmental groups question whether it’s a good deal for ratepayers. In fact, some consumer advocates have major reservations about decoupling overall. "Unfortunately, we’re seeing utilities trying to use decoupling as a blank check," says Charles Acquard, executive director of the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates in Silver Spring, Md. "We’re not absolutely opposed to decoupling. It’s how you do it that’s critical.\

Which of the following gives the best definition of the expression "to stand tradition on its head" (para. 1)

A.To criticize tradition.

B.To go against tradition.

C.To carry forward tradition.

D.To integrate tradition.

查看答案
题型:单项选择题

问题在于,对中国社会的贫富差距来说,还有着更多的、不可忽视的、加重性的重要影响因素(参数)。正是这些加重性重要影响因素的存在,使得中国现阶段的贫富差距现象更加严重。客观、全面地来看,如果说中国的贫富差距现象在某种条件下被夸大了的话,那么,在更多的情况下这一现象以及由此所造成的种种问题被人们明显地低估或掩盖了。 “这一现象”指的是( )

A.中国现阶段的贫富差距现象严重

B.贫富差距现象具有加重性重要影响的因素(参数)

C.中国的贫富差距现象在某种条件下被夸大

D.对于中国现阶段贫富差距问题严重性的轻视或掩饰

查看答案
微信公众账号搜索答案