专项职业能力证书编号中说法错误的是（）A、第1位和第2位为年份 B、第3位和第4位为省

依据《安全生产法》的规定，生产、经营、运输、储存、使用危险物品或者处置废弃危险物品的，由有关主管部门依照有关法律、法规的规定和( )审批并实施监督管理。

A．国家标准或者行业标准

B．行业标准或者企业标准

C．企业标准或者地方标准

D．国家标准或者地方标准

用中和滴定法测定烧碱的纯度，若烧碱中含有与酸不反应的杂质，试根据实验回答：

（1）将准确称取的4.23g烧碱样品配成250mL待测液，需要的主要仪器除量筒、烧杯、玻璃棒外，还必须用到的仪器有 、 ．

（2）取10.00mL待测液：用经过 （填写操作名称）的碱式滴定管量取至锥形瓶中，并加入2-3滴甲基橙．

（3）用0.2010mol?L^-1标准盐酸滴定待测烧碱溶液，滴定时左手旋转酸式滴定管的 ，右手不停地向同一方向摇动锥形瓶，两眼注视 ，直到 为止，可判断滴定到达终点．

（4）根据下列数据，烧碱的纯度为 ．

滴定次数

待测液体积 （mL）

标准盐酸体积（mL） 滴定前读数（mL）

滴定后读数（mL） 第一次

10.00

0.50

20.40 第二次

10.00

4.00

24.10

（5）判断上述标准酸滴定待测碱的过程中，下列操作引起的误差（填“偏大”、“偏小”“无影响”或“无法判断”）

①读数：滴定前平视，滴定后俯视 

②未用标准液润洗滴定管 

③用待测液润洗锥形瓶 

④不小心将标准液滴在锥形瓶外面 

⑤滴定接近终点时，用少量蒸馏水冲洗锥形瓶内壁 ．

病原菌不入血，只有其产生的毒素进入血液而引起全身中毒症

A．病毒血症

B．脓毒血症

C．败血症

D．毒血症

E．菌血症

输差计算与（）等因素有关。

A.总输入气量、总输出气量、平均压力

B.当天储气量、总输出气量、储存气量变化量

C.前天储气量、当天储气量、储存气量变化量

D.总输入气量、总输出气量、储存气量变化量

Historically, the European Union has not bothered with funding much basic scientific research. Such activities have mainly remained the preserve of national governments, not least because giving scientists free rein can lead to discoveries that not only make money but ultimately enhance military might.
That attitude is now changing. The European Commission proposes to establish a European Research Council (ERC) that would spend a maximum of 12 billion ( $14 billion) over seven years on" blue skies" research. While the plans are being generally welcomed by Europe’s member states, their details are problematic. The proposed ERC is intended to make Europe more competitive. Europe has some first-class universities, scientific institutions and research organisations. But, the ERC’s proponents argue, their activities are fragmented, so they are not reaching their full potential.
In America, teams from across the country compete with each other for grants from the National Science Foundation. The proposed ERC is modelled on this scheme. It would award grants to individual research teams for a specific project, solely on the basis of scientific merit judged by peer review. If the ERC were created, scientists from across Europe would compete with each other for funds, rather than merely competing with their fellow countrymen, as happens at present.
This compares with the limited funding for basic research that currently exists in the EU, which places its emphasis on collaboration between researchers. It is open only to researchers in a narrow range of disciplines chosen by the European Parliament and the commission. The ERC would be quite different, placing its emphasis on competition between researchers and leaving scientists themselves to decide which areas of science to pursue. Helga Nowotny, who chairs the European Research Advisory Board--an advisory body to the commission--says that winning a grant from the ERC could come to be seen as unmistakable recognition of research excellence.
The quality of European research needs to be stepped up a notch. Between 1980 and 2003, Europe had 68 Nobel laureates in medicine, physics and chemistry compared with 154 in America. With competition from China and India, Europe’s share could fall further.
One of the reasons for Europe’s relatively weak performance is thought to be a lack of genuine competition between Europe’s researchers. Another is its poor ability to attract young people into a research career. Recent estimates suggest that Europe needs an extra 700,000 researchers if it is to meet its overall target of raising spending (private, national and EU) on research and development to 3% of GDP by 2010. Many young scientists leave Europe for America once they have finished their training. Dr Nowotny says the ERC could help here too. It could establish a scheme to give young researchers the opportunity to follow their own ideas and become independent at an earlier stage in their careers, encouraging talent to stay in Europe.
The crucial issue now is whether the ERC will be able to set its own research agenda, free from the interference and bureaucracy of the commission and influence of member states. Last month,22 leading European scientists charged with shaping the ERC’s scientific strategy met for the first time to start hammering out a charter and constitution. Serious concerns remain over the legal structure of the body.
The final decision on the ERC’s legal form, on a date yet unspecified, rests with the European Parliament and member states in the European Council. If both are genuine in their support for the ERC and Europe’s aim of becoming more competitive, then they must find a way of keeping the ERC free from political interference. Europe would benefit from a competition for its best researchers which rewards scientific excellence. A quasi-competition that recognizes how many votes each member state is allotted would be pointless.

The phrase" stepped up a notch" ( paragraph 5) most probably means

A．improved.

B．decreased.

C．worsened.

D．stamped.