止端螺纹塞规，量规牙形做成截短牙形。

女，21岁，3个月来感右髋部酸痛不适，并向右膝部放射，发病前曾有扭伤史，卧床休息则症状缓解，无发热，无夜痛现象，体检：右髋旋转稍受限，局部无肿胀，未及肿块，右腹股沟韧带中点下方有深压痛，X线片发现右股骨颈内侧及股骨头见膨胀性破坏改变，骨皮质变薄且有中断现象，破坏区可见骨嵴及少许间隔存在，局部穿刺为血性液体，未获得组织块。

临床诊断最大可能是（）。

A.骨囊肿

B.动脉瘤性骨囊肿

C.内生软骨瘤

D.骨纤维异样增殖症

E.骨巨细胞瘤

当事人在行政处罚中可享有()。

A、陈述权

B、申辩权

C、申请行政复议的权利

D、提起行政诉讼的权利

E、申请免缴罚款的权利

张某，女，30岁，乳腺癌入院，常哭泣，焦虑不安，以下选项首选的护理措施是 ( )。

A．注射镇静剂
B．通知主管医生
C．通知家属探视
D．允许家属陪伴
E．让其倾诉并给予安慰

通过教师的价值观、理想、师爱、为人师表等得以体现的是教师的（）。

A.职业道德心理素质

B.教学心理素质

C.辅导心理素质

D.学习心理素质

The Supreme Court will hear arguments about the use of public money for the private schooling of children with special needs. It’s interesting to note what’s not at issue: namely, that when a public school system is unable to provide an appropriate education, it is obligated to pay the costs of private school. Too bad poor children don’t have that unshakable right; if they did, there would be no controversy about the District program that gives vouchers to low-income children to attend private schools.

The case to be heard by the court hinges on whether parents have to enroll a child with special needs in public school before the child can attend private school at public expense. Special-education advocates say students shouldn’t have to waste time before being placed in a setting that best suits their needs, while school boards worry about a ruling that could amount to an unfettered fight to private schooling at public expense. What strikes us about the emotionally charged debate is the acceptance by both sides that sometimes it is appropriate to use public money to pay for a child to go to a private school. So, why all the arguments about the approximately$14 million for a federally funded program that lets 1,700 D. C. students attend private schools instead of failing public schools

To hear critics of the D. C. Opportunity Scholarship Program tell it, the use of public money for private schooling is as unprecedented as it is undesirable. In addition to the billions of dollars spent annually on private school tuitions for students with disabilities, private schools get public money for books, technology and teacher training. As long as the money is seen as benefiting the child, it is considered a proper, even desirable, use of public dollars.

Don’t get us wrong. We’re not arguing for the unilateral right of parents to enroll their sons and daughters in any school they wish with the taxpayers picking up the bill. Abuse of special-education policies has contributed to increased costs that threaten to take needed money from general public education funds. Safeguards are needed. Public schools should be pressed to do a better job for students with disabilities and students without. But there are schools in Washington where statistics show that failure is almost guaranteed. If a school system can’t educate a child—whether because of acute special needs or its own historical failings—why should that child not have options for a " free appropriate public education "

What can we infer from the last paragraph（）

A. While putting public money in private schools, public schools can also benefit

B. Public schools only consider the need of students without disabilities

C. It is children’s right to choose private schools when public ones aren’t good enough

D. There is evidence to show that public schools in Washington D. C. are terrible