《供电营业规则》第五十四条规定：在电力系统非正常状况下，用户受电端的电压最大允许偏差

某机电安装工程项目由某市机电安装公司承建。该公司将从施工前期准备开始到联合调试和空负荷试运转完成为止的全过程施工活动划分为施工准备阶段、施工阶段和竣工验收阶段，并分别对各阶段的工作内容做了详细的安排。由于工程项目安排合理有序,且试运转均符合《机械设备安装工程施工及验收规范》规定，工程进展很顺利，并在合同工期内保质保安全地完成了施工任务。

联动试运行分工中，由( )组织、指挥，负责及时提供各种资源，编制联动试运行方案。

A．建设单位

B．施工单位

C．生产单位

D．总承包单位

由一个心皮构成子房称（），由多个心皮构成的子房称（），前者一定是（）室，后者是（）室或（）室。

结核菌素试验，下列哪项是不正确的（）

A.皮内注射0.1mlPPD

B.一般注入左前臂掌侧面中、下1/3交界处皮内

C.48～72小时后观察反应结果

D.左上臂三角肌下缘处皮内注入

E.测定局部硬结，取纵、横两者平均直径来判断其强度

安全现状评价是针对某一个生产经营单位总体或局部的生产经营活动安全现状进行的 ( )评价。

A．合理

B．准确

C．技术

D．安全

Questions 1～5

Writing articles about films for The Front Page was my first proper job. Before then I had done bits of reviewing—novels for other newspapers, films for a magazine and anything I was asked to do for the radio. That was how I met Tom Seaton, the first arts editor of The Front Page, who had also written for radio and television. He hired me, but Tom was not primarily a journalist, or he would certainly have been more careful in choosing his staff.
At first, his idea was that a team of critics should take care of the art forms that didn’t require specialized knowledge: books, TV, theatre, film and radio. There would be a weekly lunch at which we would make our choices from the artistic material that Tom had decided we should cover, though there would also be guests to make the atmosphere sociable.
It all felt a bit of a dream at that time: a new newspaper, and I was one of the team. It seemed so unlikely that a paper could he introduced into a crowded market. It seemed just as likely that a millionaire wanted to help me personally, and was pretending to employ me. Such was my lack of self-confidence. In fact, the first time I saw someone reading the newspaper on the London Underground, then turning to a page on which one of my reviews appeared, I didn’t know where to look.
Tom’s original scheme for a team of critics for the arts never took off. It was a good idea, but we didn’t get together as planned and so everything was done by phone. It turned out, too, that the general public out there preferred to associate a reviewer with a single subject area, and so I chose film. Without Tom’s initial push, though, we would hardly have come up with the present arrangement, by which I write an extended weekly piece, usually on one film.
The space I am given allows me to broaden my argument—or forces me, in an uninteresting week, to make something out of nothing. But what is my role in the public arena I assume that people choose what films to go to on the basis of the stars, the publicity or the director. There is also such a thing as loyalty to "type" or its opposite. It can only rarely happen that someone who hates westerns buys a ticket for one after reading a review, or a love story addict avoids a romantic film because of what the papers say.
So if a film review isn’t really a consumer guide, what is it I certainly don’t feel I have a responsibility to be "right" about a movie. Nor do I think there should be a certain number of "great" and "bad" films each year. All I have to do is put forward an argument. I’m not a judge, and nor would I want to be.

A weekly lunch would be arranged in order to ______

A. help the writers get to know each other
B. provide an informal information session
C. distribute the work that had to be done
D. entertain important visitors from the arts circle