人民币由中国人民银行指定的专门企业印制，并由中国人民银行统一发行。( )

Senator Barack Obama likes to joke that the battle for the Democratic presidential nomination has been going on so long, babies have been born, and they’ re already walking and talking. That’s nothing. The battle between the sciences and the humanities has been going on for so long, its early participants have stopped walking and talking, because they’re already dead.

It’s been some 50 years since the physicist-turned-novelist C. P. Snow delivered his famous "Two Cultures" lecture at the University of Cambridge, in which he decried the "gulf of mutual incomprehension", the "hostility and dislike" that divided the world’s "natural scientists", its chemists, engineers, physicists and biologists, from its "literary intellectuals", a group that, by Snow’s reckoning, included pretty much everyone who wasn’t a scientist. His critique set off a frenzy of desperation that continues to this day, particularly’in the United States, as educators, policymakers and other observers lament the Balkanization of knowledge, the scientific illiteracy of the general public and the chronic academic turf wars that are all too easily lampooned.

Yet a few scholars believe that the cultural chasm can be bridged and the sciences and the humanities united into a powerful new discipline that would apply the strengths of both mindsets, the quantitative and qualitative, to a wide array of problems. Among the most ambitious of these exercises in fusion thinking is a program under development at Binghamton University in New York called the New Humanities Initiative.

Jointly conceived by David Sloan Wilson, a professor of biology, and Leslie Heywood, a professor of English, the program is intended to build on some of the themes explored in Dr. Wilson’s evolutionary studies program, which has proved enormously popular with science and nonscience majors alike, and which he describes in the recently published "Evolution for Everyone". In Dr. Wilson’s view, evolutionary biology is a discipline that, to be done right, demands a crossover approach, the capacity to think in narrative and abstract terms simultaneously, so why not use it as a template for emulsifying the two cultures generally "There are more similarities than differences between the humanities and the sciences, and some of the stereotypes have to be altered," Dr. Wilson said, "Darwin, for example, established his entire evolutionary theory on the basis of his observations of natural history, and most of that information was qualitative, not quantitative. "

As he and Dr. Heywood envision the program, courses under the New Humanities rubric would be offered campus-wide, in any number of departments, including history, literature, philosophy, sociology, law and business. The students would be introduced to basic scientific tools like statistics and experimental design and to liberal arts staples like the importance of analyzing specific texts or documents closely, identifying their animating ideas and comparing them with the texts of other immortal minds.

By citing the example of Darwin, Dr. Wilson intends to show that（）

A. qualitative information is more valuable than quantitative observations

B. it is preferable to take the mutual advantage of science and humanities

C. science has more similarities rather than differences than humanities

D. scientists should base their theory on qualitative information

阅读下面的宋词，然后按要求回答问题。（8分）

高阳台

南宋　张炎

接叶巢莺，平波卷絮，断桥斜日归船。 能几番游，看花又是明年。 东风且伴蔷薇住，到蔷薇、春已堪怜。 更凄然， 万绿西泠，一抹荒烟。

当年燕子知何处，但苔深韦曲，草暗斜川。见说新愁，如今也到鸥边。无心再续笙歌梦，掩重门、浅醉闲眠。 莫开帘，怕见飞花，怕听啼鹃。

注：断桥、西泠，都是西湖风景点。

（1）张炎此词寄托的是南宋将亡的愁恨，但有人说这样的评论太牵强。说说你赞成哪种观点，并说说理由。（4分）

答: __________________________________________________________________

（2）这首词在表达作者的感情上是有起伏变化的，请简要分析。（4分）

答:

为合理引导产业发展，《国家重点生态功能保护区规划纲要》要求：( )。

A．禁止损害区域生态功能的产业扩张

B．发展资源环境可承载的特色产业

C．推广清洁能源

D．限制损害区域生态功能的产业扩张

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的教育和宣教，说法正确的是（）

A.教育和宣教是COPD康复的辅助部分

B.教育内容不包括呼吸道的解剖、生理、病理生理知识

C.教育内容不包括药物的作用、不良反应、剂量及正确使用

D.教育内容不包括症状的正确评估

E.教育内容包括正确及安全使用氧气，预防感冒和戒烟