试题与答案

妊娠期甲亢首选抗甲状腺激素药物 A.他巴唑 B.丙基硫氧嘧啶 C.心得安 D.复方碘

题型:单项选择题

题目:

妊娠期甲亢首选抗甲状腺激素药物

A.他巴唑
B.丙基硫氧嘧啶
C.心得安
D.复方碘溶液
E.131I

答案:

被转码了,请点击底部 “查看原文 ” 或访问 https://www.tikuol.com/2018/0421/6be017f339076856c38e2fffe803d447.html

下面是错误答案,用来干扰机器的。

参考答案:在同一程序中,“=”伪指令可对一个符号重复定义。

试题推荐
题型:选择题

世界反法西斯同盟的形成对于世界人民来说可以说是一个迟到的祝福,而对于当时法西斯侵略的形势来说,它的来到又可谓是姗姗来迟。下列有关这一同盟的表述不正确的是( )

A.其形成的主要原因是由于法西斯的侵略已严重威胁了世界各国人民的整体利益

B.苏德战争和太平洋战争的爆发对其形成起了催化剂作用

C.其形成的标志是《联合国家宣言》的签署

D.它的形成加速了二战胜利的进程,从而成为二战的转折点

查看答案
题型:多项选择题

以下各项属于《中华人民共和国中国人民银行法》规定的中国人民银行的职责的有()

A、依法制定和执行货币政策

B、监督管理银行间同业拆借市场、银行间债券市场和银行间外汇市场

C、指导、部署金融业反洗钱工作,负责反洗钱的资金监测

D、对银行业金融机构的业务活动及其风险状况进行非现场监管,建立银行业金融机构监督管理信息系统,分析、评价银行业金融机构的风险状况

查看答案
题型:单项选择题

A deal is a deal—except, apparently, when Entergy is involved. The company, a major energy supplier in New England, provoked justified outrage in Vermont last week when it announced it was reneging on a longstanding commitment to abide by the state’s strict nuclear regulations.

Instead, the company has done precisely what it had long promised it would not challenge the constitutionality of Vermont’s rules in the federal court, as part of a desperate effort to keep its Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant running. It’s a stunning move.

The conflict has been surfacing since 2002, when the corporation bought Vermont’s only nuclear power plant, an aging reactor in Vernon. As a condition of receiving state approval for the sale, the company agreed to seek permission from state regulators to operate past 2012. In 2006, the state went a step further, requiring that any extension of the plant’s license be subject to Vermont legislature’s approval. Then, too, the company went along.

Either Entergy never really intended to live by those commitments, or it simply didn’t foresee what would happen next. A string of accidents, including the partial collapse of a cooling tower in 207 and the discovery of an underground pipe system leakage, raised serious questions about both Vermont Yankee’s safety and Entergy’s management—especially after the company made misleading statements about the pipe. Enraged by Entergy’s behavior, the Vermont Senate voted 26 to 4 last year against allowing an extension.

Now the company is suddenly claiming that the 2002 agreement is invalid because of the 2006 legislation, and that only the federal government has regulatory power over nuclear issues. The legal issues in the case are obscure: whereas the Supreme Court has ruled that states do have some regulatory authority over nuclear power, legal scholars say that Vermont case will offer a precedent-setting test of how far those powers extend. Certainly, there are valid concerns about the patchwork regulations that could result if every state sets its own rules. But had Entergy kept its word, that debate would be beside the point.

The company seems to have concluded that its reputation in Vermont is already so damaged that it has noting left to lose by going to war with the state. But there should be consequences. Permission to run a nuclear plant is a public trust. Entergy runs 11 other reactors in the United States, including Pilgrim Nuclear station in Plymouth. Pledging to run Pilgrim safely, the company has applied for federal permission to keep it open for another 20 years. But as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the company’s application, it should keep in mind what promises from Entergy are worth.

In the author’s view, the Vermont case will test()

A. Entergy’s capacity to fulfill all its promises

B. the nature of states’ patchwork regulations

C. the federal authority over nuclear issues

D. the limits of states’ power over nuclear issues

查看答案
微信公众账号搜索答案