肝脏功能严重受损时不可能出现的情况是（）。 A.血清ALT升高 B.A／C比值降低

下列有关电解质溶液中微粒的物质的量浓度关系正确的是（　　）

A．在0.1mol•L^-1NaHCO₃溶液中：c（Na⁺）＞c（HCO₃^-）＞c（CO₃^2-）＞c（H₂CO₃）

B．在0.1mol•L^-1Na₂CO₃溶液中：c（OH^-）-c（H⁺）=c（HCO₃^-）+2c（H₂CO₃）

C．向0.2 mol•L^-1NaHCO₃溶液中加入等体积0.1mol•L^-1NaOH溶液：c（CO₃^2-）＞c（HCO₃^-）＞c（OH^-）＞c（H⁺）

D．常温下，CH₃COONa和CH₃COOH混合溶液[pH=7，c（Na⁺）=0.1mol•L^-1]：c（Na⁺）=c（CH₃COO^-）＞c（CH₃COOH）＞c（H⁺）=c（OH^-）

某工业厂房工程于1998年3月12日开工，1998年10月27日竣工验收合格。该厂房供热系统于2001年2月出现部分管道漏水，业主检查发现原施工单位所用管材与其向监理工程师报验不符。全部更换厂房供热管道需人民币30万元，将造成该厂部分车间停产损失人民币20万元。

业主就此事件提出如下要求：

(1)要求施工单位全部返工更换厂房供热管道，并赔偿停产损失的60%(计人民币 12万元)。

(2)要求监理公司对全部返工工程免费监理，并对停产损失承担连带赔偿责任，赔偿停产损失的40%(计人民币8万元)。

施工单位答复如下：

该厂房供热系统已超过国家规定的保修期，不予保修，也不同意返工，更不同意赔偿停产损失。

监理单位答复如下：

监理工程师已对施工单位报验的管材进行了检查，符合质量标准，已履行了监理职责。施工单位擅自更换管材，由施工单位负责，监理单位不承担任何责任。

【问题】

1．依据现行法律和行政法规，请指出业主的要求和施工单位、监理单位的答复中各有哪些错误，为什么

2．简述施工单位和监理单位各应负何责任，为什么

药材山药的加工方法是（）

A.蒸或沸水中烫至无白心，晒干

B.直接晒干

C.去皮，蒸或煮至透心，晒干

D.立即清洗，除去粗皮，蒸透心，低温干燥

E.去外皮及须根，晒干

It seems incredible to me that Latin is not taught in schools as a matter of course, especially in a country that is forever lamenting its own (undeniable) mediocrity when it comes to speaking foreign languages. As a 13-year-old, I hardly approached my own Latin lessons with anything resembling enthusiasm—I might have been keener if Aeneas went to the shops occasionally—but I am terrifically grateful I had them, all the same.
The benefits are many. Having a basic grounding in Latin makes learning Romance languages a doodle(轻而易举的事): the fact that I speak English plus three others has less to do with any genetic predisposition—I was hopeless at learning Russian—than with an understanding of the root and provenance of Latin-derived words.
It would be impossible to have a smattering of Latin and find oneself stuck in Italy, provided one managed to persuade the speaker to slow down a bit. And the reason I can (arguably) just about string a sentence together in English—which isn’t my first language—has a great deal to do with understanding, through Latin, the way sentences and grammar work.
Latin also has its own pleasing internal logic: you follow the rules and you get the answer. And I really believe that if you know Latin, you half-speak French already. The British used not to be appalling at languages: my theory is that they only became so during the past century, when Latin stopped being widely taught.
Detractors(恶意批评者) might point out that there is little use in learning a dead language. But Latin is not dead: it’s everywhere. It makes the kind of people who never use two short words when six big ones will do intelligible. It demystifies jargon and legalese. It helps with crosswords. It even forces those of us who are pathologically illogical to think logically every once in a while: I remember the pleasure I felt at school, during Latin translation, when I realized I could create order and sense out of apparent chaos.
Really, Latin’s useful applications are manifold. Watching Who Wants To Be A Millionaire a few weeks ago, I noticed that the question which felled the contestant would almost certainly not have stumped him had he had some Latin. Of all the possible answers, only one had a Latin root that echoed the question. From Cicero to Chris Tarrant in a few easy steps, you can’t say more modem or less dusty than that.

That Latin is not dead is shown by all of the following EXCEPT ______.

A．some difficult technical words become easy to understand

B．crossword puzzles become easy to be solved

C．some people become more logical in their way of thinking

D．some people become more self-confident