在实施阶段，( )是限额设计和工程造价控制的约束标准。A．估算指标B．概算指标C．

乙工厂为了增加自己产品销量，模仿某著名厂家甲生产的同类产品的包装，足以使消费者认为该产品是甲工厂生产的。关于这一事件下列表述正确的是( )。

A．两种产品的包装类似，足以使消费者产生混淆，故乙工厂行为属不正当行为

B．尽管包装类似，如果消费者经过仔细判断仍然能够区分出来属于乙工厂生产，就不属于不正当竞争行为

C．乙工厂的产品如果表明了自己的商标和厂址，就不构成侵权

D．如果甲工厂没有就该包装申请专利权，则乙工厂的行为就是正当行为

(S．L．L)表示

A．AS
B．AI
C．TOF
D．PS
E．MS

查询持有外币种类在4种以上人员的姓名，及持有的种类数量，并按种类数量升序排列，数量相同时，则按姓名降序排列，下列语句中正确的是( )。

A．SELECT 姓名,COUNT(*) AS 外币种类 FROM 持有数； GROUP BY 姓名 HAVING COUNT(*)＞=4; ORDER BY 外币种类，姓名 DESC

B．SELECT 姓名,COUNT(*) AS 外币种类 FROM 持有数； GROUP BY 姓名 HAVING COUNT(*)＞=4； ORDERBYCOUNT(*)，姓名DESC

C．SELECT姓名,COUNT(*)AS外币种类FROM持有数； GROUP BY姓名HAVINGCOUNT(*)＞=4； ORDER BY外币种类 AND 姓名 DESC

D．SELECT姓名,COUNT(*)AS外币种类FROM持有数； GROUP BY 姓名HAVING COUNT(*)＞=4； ORDER BY 外币种类+姓名 DESC

劳动争议：指在劳动者和劳动力使用者之间因劳动权利与义务发生分歧而引起的争议。
根据以上定义，下列行为属于劳动争议的是：( )

A．职工甲因工伤未能获得赔偿而与工厂争执

B．甲企业与乙企业之间因借调某一职工而产生矛盾

C．职工甲因工作调动而与当地的劳动部门发生争执

D．某厂职工甲与职工乙因工作意见不一而产生矛盾

Shortly after September 11th, President Bush’s father observed that just as Pearl Harbor awakened this country from the notion that we could somehow avoid the call of duty to defend freedom in Europe and Asia in World War Two, so, too, should this most recent surprise attack erase the concept in some quarters that America can somehow go it alone in the fight against terrorism or in anything else for that matter.

But America’s allies have begun to wonder whether that is the lesson that has been learned--or whether the Afghanistan campaign’s apparent success shows that unilateralism works just fine. The United States, that argument goes, is so dominant that it can largely afford to go it alone.

It is true that no nation since Rome has loomed so large above the others, but even Rome eventually collapsed. Only a decade ago, the conventional wisdom lamented an America in decline. Bestseller lists featured books that described America’s fall. Japan would soon become "Number One". That view was wrong at the time, and when I wrote "Bound to Lead" in 1989, I, like others, predicted the continuing rise of American power. But the new conventional wisdom that America is invincible is equally dangerous if it leads to a foreign policy that combines unilateralism, arrogance and parochialism.

A number of advocates of "realist" international-relations theory have also expressed concern about America’s staying-power. Throughout history, coalitions of countries have arisen to balance dominant powers, and the search for traditional shifts in the balance of power and new state challengers is well under way. Some see China as the new enemy; others envisage a Russia-China-India coalition as the threat. But even if China maintains high growth rates of 6% while the United States achieves only 2%, it will not equal the United States in income per head until the last half of the century.

Still others see a uniting Europe as a potential federation that will challenge the United States for primacy. But this forecast depends on a high degree of European political unity, and a low state of transatlantic relations. Although realists raise an important point about the leveling of power in the international arena, their quest for new cold-war-style challengers is largely barking up the wrong tree. They are ignoring deeper changes in the distribution and nature of power in the contemporary world. The paradox of American power in the 21st century is that the largest power since Rome cannot achieve its objectives unilaterally in a global information age.

According to the text, cooperative bodies of countries have emerged（）

A. to defeat new state challengers

B. to defend international relations

C. to maintain high growth rates

D.to equalize dominant powers