分包工程价款由分包单位与( )结算。 A．甲方 B．乙方 C．监理工程师 D，

阅读下面短文，完成文后五题。

历史是无情的，也是无私的。历史无情，是因为任何人都不能阻挡历史潮流的前进；历史无私，是因为它总是一如既往地给一代代人留下宝贵的遗产和丰富的智慧。问题在于，人们如何面对历史潮流，怎样看待历史智慧。这两者，又是相辅相成的辩证关系。古往今来，许多有识之士，都懂得这些遗产和智慧对于人们从事现实的与未来的创造具有非常重要的价值和意义，因而也就必然能够更好地面对历史潮流。而面向新的世纪，我们必须进一步深入研究历史潮流、历史智慧与人们的历史活动的相互关系，提高人们对于历史智慧的认识，促进人们学习历史，从史学中汲取更多智慧。

我们要从史学中汲取更多的智慧。首先，要正确对待新鲜智慧同历史智慧之间的关系。处在改革开放时代的中国人民必须不断地学习新知识，增长新智慧，在教育和科技上缩小同发达国家的距离。同时，历史智慧作为曾经存在过的知识结晶，永远有活泼的生命力，我们要更好地从对于鉴、势、理、道的理解、领悟、体察中学到许多聪明才智，进退自如地迎接新时代所面临的种种挑战。要提高从史学中汲取历史智慧的自觉性，从而提高全民族的精神素质和科学素质。史学工作者要充分地认识到肩负的责任，并写出内容充实、根据可靠而又富于启发性的著作；要抵制、批评那些打着“历史”旗号而贩卖庸俗、低俗、媚俗的“历史书”。只有这样，史学工作者不仅自身注重了从史学中汲取更多智慧，而且也才能向广大读者向社会提供得以从史学中汲取更多智慧的高水平著作。最后，端正学风是从史学中汲取更多智慧的关键。历史是严肃的，它不以人们的意志为转移。它要求人们尊重历史，认识史学在“彰往察来”方面的崇高作用。因此对历史要真正视其为“人生之急务”、“国家之要道”，真正理解到“史非一家之书，实千载之书”，就当以“实事求是”为原则。

选自《新华文摘·历史·史学·历史智慧》，作者瞿林东

下列各项中对文章内容表述错误的一项是（）。

A．历史是无情的，因为任何人都不能阻挡历史潮流的前进。

B．本文所说的“历史知识”与“历史智慧”含义相同。

C．本文第一段指出学习、研究历史的目的是古为今用。

D．第二段重点表述的是怎样才能从史学中汲取更多的智慧。

对医德情感的正确理解是（）。

A.医德情感纯粹是医务人员内心自生的主观感受

B.医德情感纯粹是医务人员个人喜好的产物

C.医德情感纯粹是医务人员个人利益的产物

D.医德情感是医务人员在医疗活动中对自己和他人行为之间关系的内心体验

E.医德情感是与医德义务没有任何关系的

莫高窟的两个大佛分别是第96窟高35米的北大像和第（）窟高26米的南大像。两窟都建于（）朝。

A、130、唐

B、158、隋

C、148、五代

D、100、北周

Almost everyone agrees that America’s health-care system has the incentives all wrong. Under the present system, doctors and hospitals get paid for doing more, even if added tests, operations and procedures have little chance of improving patients’ health. So what happens when someone proposes that we alter the incentives to reward better care, not more care Well, Rep. Paul Ryan and Republicans found out. No surprise: Democrats slammed them for "ending Medicare as we know it. "

This predictably partisan reaction preying upon the anxieties of retirees—must depress anyone who cares about the country’s future. It is only a slight exaggeration to say that unless we end Medicare "as we know it," America "as we know it" will end. Spiraling health spending is the crux of our federal budget problem. In 1965—the year Congress created Medicare and Medicaid—health spending was 2.6 percent of the budget. In 2010, it was 26.5 percent. The Obama administration estimates it will be 30.3 percent in 2016. By contrast, defense spending is about 20 percent; scientific research and development is 4 percent.

Uncontrolled health spending isn’t simply crowding out other government programs; it’s also dampening overall living standards. Health economists Michael Chernew, Richard Hirth and David Cutler recently reported that higher health costs consumed 35.7 percent of the increase in per capita income from 1999 to 2007. They also project that, under reasonable assumptions, it could absorb half or more of the gain between now and 2083.

Ryan proposes to change that. Beginning in 2022, new (not existing) Medicare beneficiaries would receive a voucher, valued initially at about $ 8,000. The theory is simple. Suddenly empowered, Medicare beneficiaries would shop for lowest-cost, highest-quality insurance plans providing a required package of benefits. The health-care delivery system would be forced to restructure by reducing costs and improving quality. Doctors, hospitals and clinics would form networks; there would be more "coordination" of care, helped by more investment in information technology; better use of deductibles and co-payments would reduce unnecessary trips to doctors’ offices or clinics.

It’s shock therapy. Would it work No one knows, but two things are clear. First, as Medicare goes, so goes the entire health-care system. Medicare is the nation’s largest insurance program, with 48 million recipients and spending last year of $ 520 billion. Second, few doubt that today’s health-care system has much waste: medical care that does no good.

Under Ryan’s plan, incentives would shift. Medicare would no longer be an open ATM; the vouchers would limit total spending. Providers would face pressures to do more with less; there would certainly be charges that essential care was being denied. The Obama administration argues that better results can be achieved by modifying incentives within the existing system. Perhaps. But history suggests skepticism. It’s Ryan’s radicalism vs. President Obama’s remedy policy. Which is realistic and which is wishful thinking Burdened by runaway spending, Medicare "as we know it" is going to end. The only questions are when and on whose terms.

The medicare reform proposed by Ryan would have the effect of（）

A. reducing budget in health-care and improving its efficiency

B. giving doctors and hospitals more power in health-care

C. reducing the burden of doctors and hospitals in health-care

D. shocking the medicare beneficiaries into panic and anxieties

企业购置固定资产，在企业现金流量表中的（）反映。

A.经营活动的现金流量

B.投资活动的现金流量

C.筹资活动的现金流量

D.财务活动的现金流量