城市规划行政主管部门对城市规划区内的建设工程是否符合规划要求，是( )检查的。A．

孙某向刘某借款10000元，双方未约定还款期限，1998年3月4日，刘某要求孙某在1个月内还款，但孙某直到6个月后才向刘某还了1000元，其余部分则继续拖欠。如果刘某要起诉孙某，诉讼时效应从何时开始( )

A．1998年3月4日

B．1998产4月3日

C．刘某向孙某交付10000元时

D．孙某向刘某归还1000元时

阅读下面的文言文，完成下面的题。

　　周惠达字怀文，章武文安人也。父信，少仕州郡，历乐乡、平舒、平成三县令，皆以廉能称。

　　惠达幼有节操，好读书，美容貌。魏齐王萧宝夤为瀛州刺史，召惠达及河间冯景同在阁下，甚礼之。及宝夤还朝，惠达随入洛阳。宝夤西征，惠达复随入关。宝夤除雍州刺史，令惠达使洛阳。未还，而宝夤谋反闻于京师。有司以惠达是其行人，将执之。惠达乃私驰还。至潼关，遇大使杨侃。侃谓曰：“何为故入兽口？”惠达曰：“萧王必为左右所误，今往，庶其改图。”及至，宝夤反形已露，不可弥缝。遂用惠达为光禄勋、中书舍人。宝夤既败，唯惠达等数人从之。宝夤语惠达曰：“人生富贵，左右咸言尽节，及遭厄难，乃知岁寒也。”

　　贺拔岳获宝夤送洛，留惠达为府祭酒，给其衣马，即与参议。岳为关中大行台，以惠达为从事中郎。尝使至洛，魏孝武与惠达语及世难。惠达陈天下时势，述岳有诚节，唯以忧国定乱为事。言辞激切，帝甚嘉之。及还，具以白岳。岳曰：“人生于天，受命于君，岂有利人荣禄，而不忧其祸难？卿之所奏，实获吾心。”自是更被亲礼。岳每征讨，恒命惠达居守。又转岳府属。

　　岳为侯莫陈悦所害，悦得惠达，欲官之。惠达辞以疾，不见许，乃遁入汉阳之麦积崖。悦平，惠达归于太祖，即用秦州司马，安辑陇右。及太祖为大都督总管兵起雍，复以惠达为府司马。太祖为大 * * 、大行台，以惠达为行台尚书、大 * * 府司马，封文安县子，邑三百户。太祖出镇华州，留惠达知后事。于时既承丧乱，庶事多阙。惠达营造戎仗，储积食粮，简阅士马，以济军国之务，时甚赖焉。寻除中书令，进爵为公，增邑通前九百户，加卫大 * * 、左光禄大夫。

　　惠达虽居显职，性谦退，善下人，尽心勤公，进拔良士。以此人皆敬而附之。十年，薨。追封萧国公。（节选自《周书·列传十四》，有删节）

1．对下列句子中加粗的词的解释，不正确的一项是 （　　）

A．惠达辞以疾，不见许／见：被

B．今往，庶其改图／庶：希望

C．何为故入兽口／故：缘故

D．太祖出镇华州，留惠达知后事／知：主持

2．以下各组句子中，全都表明周惠达为人有节操的一组是 （　　）

①宝夤西征，惠达复随入关

②惠达乃私驰还

③唯惠达等数人从之

④给其衣马，即与参议

⑤惠达辞以疾

⑥储积食粮，简阅士马

A．①②⑤

B．②③⑤

C．③④⑥

D．①⑤⑥

3．下列对原文有关内容的概括和分析，不正确的一项是 （　　）

A．周惠达得知魏齐王萧宝夤要谋反后，虽然自己并不赞同，但为报知遇之恩，仍然从洛阳赶往雍州，去追随他。

B．周惠达在与魏孝武谈论天下时势时，说明贺拔岳有忠诚的气节，既得到了孝武帝的赞赏，又很得贺拔岳的欢心。

C．太祖外出镇守华州时，辅佐太祖的周惠达，呕心沥血，后方事务大都有赖于他。不久，太祖给了他加官进爵的奖赏。

D．周惠达虽然身居显要职位，但品性谦让，善居人之后，为公事尽心尽职，推荐选拔优秀人士，因此人人都敬重他依附他。

4．将原文中画线的句子翻译成现代汉语。

（1）有司以惠达是其行人，将执之。

__________________________________________________

（2）人生富贵，左右咸言尽节，及遭厄难，乃知岁寒也。

__________________________________________________

（3）岳为侯莫陈悦所害，悦得惠达，欲官之。

__________________________________________________

在审查担保类文件时，公司业务人员应特别注意抵(质)押协议生效的前提条件(如向有关部门登记生效)。( )

Congress began 2010 with a bad case of legislative deja vu. Last year, it approved a $ 787 billion stimulus package meant to "create or save" millions of jobs. President Obama says the stimulus has saved or created as many as 2 million jobs so far. But even if that highly optimistic figure is true, in the real world, over 3 million jobs have been lost since the stimulus was signed into law--a dismal feat all financed with enormous debt. Now Congress is working on another stimulus package, but they’re calling it a jobs bill. In December, the House passed a $174 billion "Jobs for Main Street Bill" that would use federal dollars to fund job-creating infrastructure projects, while extending unemployment benefits. Sound familiar

Unemployment remains at about 10% and state unemployment insurance funds are running out of money. While the Obama administration works to artificially inflate the number of jobs, the unemployed face diminished opportunities and income security. By 2012, 40 state unemployment trust funds are projected to be empty, requiring $ 90 billion in federal loans to continue operating Normally, state unemployment benefits pay jobless workers between 50 and 70% of their salaries for up to 26 weeks. But during this recession, what would be wrong with that Everything. The state-federal unemployment insurance program (UI) is an economic drag on businesses and states. And it’s a poor safety net for the unemployed.

UI, a relic of the Depression, fails workers when they need it most. UI trust funds depend on a state- levied payroll tax on employers. During boom years, these funds are generally flush. But during recessions, they can get depleted quickly. The bind is that to replenish their UI fund, states have to raise payroll taxes. That hurts the bottom line for most businesses. Passed on to workers as a lower salary, high payroll taxes discourage businesses from hiring. During steep recessions, states face a fiscal Catch- 22: Reduce benefits or raise taxes. To date, 27 states have depleted their UI funds and are using $ 29 billion in federal loans they’ll have to start repaying in 2011. Other states are slashing benefits. While federal guidelines recommend that states keep one year’s worth of unemployment reserves, many states entered the recession already insolvent. When federal loans are exhausted, the only option left is higher payroll taxes--a move sure to discourage hiring and depress salaries.

The increasingly small and uncertain payouts of UI are the opposite of income security. The effect of UI’s eight-decade experiment has been to condition workers to save less for a "rainy day" and instead rely on a system that provides no guarantee. UI limits personal responsibility to save; gradually, individuals find themselves in financial peril. Real reform requires putting employees in charge with individual private accounts and getting the government out of the business of creating illusionary safety nets.

Unemployment Insurance Savings Accounts (UISAs), by contrast, give workers control of their own income, eliminating the negative effects of the UI program on businesses and budgets. Adopted by Chile in 2003, UISAs are also financed via a payroll tax on individual workers and employers. The difference is the money is directly deposited into the individual worker’s account. Basically a form of forced savings, UISAs allow individuals to draw on their own accounts during periods of unemployment and roll unused funds into their savings upon retirement. With the burden reduced on employers, wages rise, leading to greater contributions to the individual’s fund. The federal government is removed from the picture. And all workers are guaranteed a savings account upon retirement.

UISAs liberate workers from uncertainty and improve incentives. When unemployed workers must rely on their own funds rather than the common fiscal pool, they find jobs faster. Congress’s repeated extensions of the current UI program may be well intended, but they may also be counterproductive. Like any deadline extension, additional jobless benefits diminish the job seeker’s urgency, all at taxpayers’ expense.

Today, expanded UI benefits mean higher state payroI1 taxes, which make it harder for employers to expand hiring or raise wages. UISAs, on the other hand, make the payroll tax on business part of the employer’s investment in an individual worker, rather than a penalty for doing business. In 2010, it’s time to say goodbye e to the problems created by broken policies. Congress should start this decade with a promise for true economic freedom: Let businesses create jobs and let workers keep what they’ve earned.

Which of the following is NOT true about Unemployment Insurance Savings Accounts().

A. Both individual workers and employers contribute to UISAs via payroll tax.

B. UISAs give workers much certainty and improve incentives.

C. In practicing UISAs, the federal government shoulders a heavier responsibility.

D. UISAs greatly reduce the negative effects of UI on employers and businesses.

失声音哑产生的原因有（）

A.外邪乘肺，肺气失宣

B.肺肾阴虚，津不上承

C.脏气将绝

D.胞络脉阻，精不上承

E.脾虚生湿，湿阻息逆