L型空压机的传动部件的润滑系统由（）等组成。A、齿轮泵 B、滤油器 C、冷却器 D、

 阅读下面的文字，根据要求作文。

心灵花圃

在美国，有一段时间，石油销售量一向领先的石油大王哈默对东欧国家的石油输出量减少了，而他的竞争对手的石油输出量却略有增加。人们对这一现象不理解。当一张小报的记者杰西克问及这一最敏感的话题，哈默却和颜悦色地回答：“关照别人就是关照自己。那些想在竞争中走在别人前面的人，都应当明白，关照别人，就是一条最好走最快捷的路。”

当时杰西克不理解哈默的话，以为他只是故弄玄虚敷衍了事。直到10年后他读了有关哈默的报道中的一个小故事，他才恍然大悟。

一年冬天，年轻的哈默随一群同伴流亡到美国南加州一个名叫沃尔逊的小镇。那些天，冬雨霏霏，镇长杰克逊门前的花圃旁的小路成了—片泥淖，行人只好从花圃里穿过，弄得花圃一片狼藉。哈默替镇长痛惜，便不顾寒雨淋身，制止行人从花圃里穿行。这时，只见镇长笑意盈盈地挑着一担炉渣回来了，在哈默面前从从容容地把炉渣铺在泥淖里。小路畅通了，再也没有人从花圃里穿过了。镇长意味深长地对哈默说：“你看，关照别人就是关照自己，有什么不好？”

善良的镇长的言行给哈默的心灵一次极大的震撼。

上面的文字，引发了你怎样的联想或感悟？请根据你的联想或感悟写一篇文章，不少于800字。

进程控制块PCB的内容可以分成哪几部分

A．进程信息和控制信息

B．进程信息和现场信息

C．调度信息和现场信息

D．调度信息和进程信息

It was a ruling that had consumers seething with anger and many a free trader crying foul. On November 20th the European Court of Justice decided that Tesco, a British supermarket chain, should not be allowed to import jeans made by America’s Levi Strauss from outside the European Union and sell them at cut-rate prices without getting permission first from the jeans maker. Ironically, the ruling is based on an EU trademark directive that was designed to protect local, not American, manufacturers from price dumping. The idea is that any brand-owning firm should be allowed to position its goods and segment its markets as it sees fit: Levi’s jeans, just like Gucci handbags, must be allowed to be expensive.

Levi Strauss persuaded the court that, by selling its jeans cheaply alongside soap powder and bananas, Tesco was destroying the image and so the value of its brands—which could only lead to less innovation and, in the long run, would reduce consumer choice. Consumer groups and Tesco say that Levi’s case is specious. The supermarket argues that it was just arbitraging the price differential between Levi’s jeans sold in America and Europe—a service performed a million times a day in financial markets, and one that has led to real benefits for consumers. Tesco has been selling some 15,000 pairs of Levi’s jeans a week, for about half the price they command in specialist stores approved by Levi Strauss. Christine Cross, Tesco’s head of global non-food sourcing, says the ruling risks "creating a Fortress Europe with a vengeance".

The debate will rage on, and has implications well beyond casual clothes (Levi Strauss was joined in its lawsuit by Zino Davidoff, a perfume maker). The question at its heart is not whether brands need to control how they are sold to protect their image, but whether it is the job of the courts to help them do this. Gucci, an Italian clothes label whose image was being destroyed by loose licensing and over-exposure in discount stores, saved itself not by resorting to the courts but by ending contracts with third-party suppliers, controlling its distribution better and opening its own stores. It is now hard to find cut-price Gucci anywhere.

Brand experts argue that Levi Strauss, which has been losing market share to hipper rivals such as Diesel, is no longer p enough to command premium prices. Left to market forces, so-so brands such as Levi’s might well fade away and be replaced by fresher labels. With the courts protecting its prices, Levi Strauss may hang on for longer. But no court can help to make it a great brand again.

According to the passage, the doomed fate of Levi’s is caused by such factors except that（）

A. the rivals are competitive

B. it fails to command premium prices

C. market forces have their own rules

D. the court fails to give some help

插条造林

2000年9月，圆明园青铜牛首等三件国宝在海外漂泊一百四十年后，终于回到祖国怀抱，导致他们流失国外的罪魁祸首是（）

A.日本军队

B.俄国军队

C.八国联军

D.英法联军