在同样条件、同样劳动强度下，不同的人劳动代谢量虽然不同，但劳动代谢率是基本相同的.

阅读理解。

     Laws that would have ensured pupils from five to 16 received a full financial education got lost in the

'wash up'. An application is calling on the next government to bring it back.

     At school the children are taught to add up and subtract (减法) but, extraordinarily, are not routinely

shown how to open a bank account-let alone how to manage their finances in an increasingly complex and

demanding world. 

     Today the parenting website Mumsnet and the consumer campaigner Martin Lewis have joined forces

to launch an online application to make financial education a compulsory element of the school curriculum

in England. Children from five to 16 should be taught about everything from pocket money to pensions,

they say. And that was exactly the plan preserved in the Children, Schools and Families bill that was shelved

by the government in the so-called "wash-up" earlier this month-the rush to legislation before parliament

was dismissed. Consumer and parent groups believe financial education has always been one of the most

frustrating omissions of the curriculum.

     As the Personal Finance Education Group (Pfeg) points out, the good habits of young children do not

last long. Over 75% of seven- to 11-year-olds are savers but by the time they get to 17, over half of them

are in debt to family and friends. By this age, 26% see a credit card or overdraft (透支) as a way of extending

their spending power. Pfeg predicts that these young people will"find it much harder to avoid the serious

unexpected dangers that have befallen many of their parents' generation unless they receive good quality

financial education while at school."

     The UK has been in the worst financial recession (衰退) for generations. It does seem odd that-unless

parents step in-young people are left in the dark until they are cruelly introduced to the world of debt when

they turn up at university. In a recent poll of over 8,000 people, 97% supported financial education in schools,

while 3% said it was a job for parents.

1. The passage is mainly about _____.

A. how to manage school lessons

B. how to deal with the financial crisis

C. teaching young people about money

D. teaching students how to study effectively

2. It can be inferred from the first two paragraphs that _____.

A. the author complains about the school education

B. pupils should not be taught to add up and subtract

C. students have been taught to manage their finances

D. laws on financial education have been effectively carried out

3. The website and the consumer campaigner joined to _____.

A. instruct the pupils to donate their pocket money

B. promote the connection of schools and families

C. ask the government to dismiss the parliament

D. appeal for the curriculum of financial education

4. According to Pfeg, _____.

A. it is easy to keep good habits long

B. teenagers spend their money as planned

C. parents are willing to pay the debt for their kids

D. it will be in trouble if the teenagers are left alone

5. A poll is mentioned to _____.

A. stress the necessity of the curriculum reform

B. show the seriousness of the financial recession

C. make the readers aware of burden of the parents

D. illustrate some people are strongly against the proposal

(1)屋内进水 (2)维修房屋 (3)整理物品 (4)申请事假 (5)天降暴雨

A．4—5—1—3—2

B．5—1—4—2—3

C．4—2—3—5—1

D．5—3—1—2—4

7个月男婴，发热、咳嗽5天，近2天来呕吐，每天4次，今天突然抽搐3次，曾注射青霉素3天。出生后已接种卡介苗，以往无抽搐史，否认头部创伤史。查体：嗜睡状，轻气促，前囟饱满，颈无抵抗，两肺少许中小湿啰音。巴氏征（+），克布征（-）。实验室检查：PPD试验0.8×0.9cm。血常规WBC18×10⁹／L，N66％，L34％。脑脊液：外观微混，WBC900×10⁶／L，N80％，L20％，蛋白质1800mg／L，氯化物102mmol／L，糖2.5mmol／L。涂片未见细菌。

应首选哪组抗生素治疗（）

A.青霉素+氨苄青霉素

B.复方新诺明

C.异烟肼+链霉素

D.庆大霉素+苯唑青霉素

E.庆大霉素+氨苄青霉素

如治疗半年无效，可选用下列治疗，除了

A．脾切除

B．长春新碱1～2mg/次，每周1次连用4～6周

C．大剂量丙种球蛋白0.4g/kg，连用5天

D．血浆置换

E．骨髓移植

消费者应向直接出卖劣质商品的经营者索赔损失。