关于子宫内膜癌的描述，下列哪一项是错误的（） A.患者多为老年妇女 B.临床表现有绝

台湾自然条件优越，物产富饶，享有众多的美誉。下列美誉不属于台湾的是（ ）

A．水果之乡

B．森林之海

C．聚宝盆

D．海上米仓

Recently, an almost literal case of lifeboat ethics(伦理) occurred. On Aug. 4, Graham and Sheryl Anley, while boating off the coast of South Africa, hit a rock. As the boat threatened to sink the husband got off, but his wife was trapped in the boat. Instead of freeing his wife and getting her to shore, Graham grabbed Rosie, their pet dog. With Rosie safe and sound, Graham returned for Sheryl. All are doing fine.

It's a great story, but it doesn't strike me as especially newsworthy. News is supposed to be about something fairly unique, and recent research suggests that, in the right circumstances, lots of people also would have grabbed their Rosie first.

We have strange relationships with our pets. We lavish our pets with adoration and better health care than billions of people receive. We speak to pets with the same high-pitched voices that we use for babies. As an extreme example of our feelings about pets, the Nazis had strict laws that guaranteed the humane treatment of the pets of Jews being shipped to death camps.

A recent paper by George Regents University demonstrates this human involvement with pets to an astonishing extent. Participants in the study were told a situation in which a bus is out of control, bearing down on a dog and a human. Which do you save? With responses from more than 500 people, the answer was that it depended: What kind of human and what kind of dog?

Everyone would save a brother, grandparent or close friend rather than a strange dog. But when people considered their own dog versus people less connected with them—a distant cousin or a hometown stranger—votes in favor of saving the dog came rolling in. And an astonishing 40% of respondents, including 46% of women, voted to save their dog over a foreign tourist.

What does a finding like this mean? First, that your odds aren't so good if you find yourself in another country with a bus bearing down on you and a cute dog. But it also points to something deeper: our unprecedented(史无前例的) attitude toward animals, which got its start with the birth of humane societies in the 19th century.

We prison people who abuse animals, put ourselves in harm's way in boats between whales and whalers and show sympathy to Bambi and his mother. We can extend empathy to an animal and feel its pain like no other species. But let's not be too proud of ourselves. As this study and too much of our history show, we're pretty selective about how we extend our humaneness to other human beings.

小题1:What is the function of the first paragraph?

A．To create a relaxing mood for readers.

B．To present the theme of this essay straightly.

C．To lead in the main topic of this essay.

D．To raise problems that will be solved later.小题2:The author mentions Nazi laws in the third paragraph _______________.

A．to show how cruel the Nazis were to the Jews

B．as an example to persuade people not to love pets

C．to illustrate the strange relationship between human and pets

D．as an example to display the humaneness of the Nazis小题3:Which of the following is true according to the article?

A．The story of the Anleys and their dog was too unique to be newsworthy.

B．Most people surveyed choose to save their own dog rather than a human.

C．It was in the 19^th century that human beings started to love their pets.

D．Human beings are more and more concerned with animals nowadays.小题4:What does the author mainly argue for?

A．Pets are of great significance to us human beings.

B．We should rethink about our attitude towards animals and mankind.

C．It is kind of human beings to extend humaneness to animals.

D．We should be selective when showing attitude toward other human beings.

某公司于2003年向市统计局多报年产值200万元。市统计局工业科在审核年报资料时发现了这一情况，认为这是违反《统计法》的行为，遂对该公司统计员王某作出一定数额罚款的处罚决定。

市统计局工业科是否有权作出处罚决定？若有，依据是什么？若没有，那么该处罚决定应由谁作出？

原告甲（女）和被告乙（男）于1988年结婚，婚后生有一女取名吴某，目前正在中学读书。2001年7月，双方因感情不和，经某市某区人民法院判决离婚。在离婚判决中确认女儿吴某随其父亲乙共同生活，甲每月负担抚育费200元，至吴某满18周岁时止。同时判定，甲可于每个月最后一个周末接吴某到自己家中共同生活1天。离婚后，甲不但每月将女儿接回家中1次，而且常常到女儿所在的中学看望女儿。由于原、被告在离婚之前的争吵给女儿的心理造成不良影响，加之吴某对母亲从前喜欢打麻将非常不满，对甲的探望经常流露出冷漠甚至厌烦的情绪。2002年2月的一个周末，甲将女儿接到自己住处，晚上来了几个朋友一起玩牌，场面一片喧哗，吴某非常反感，认为影响了自己复习功课，背起书包回到自己家中。此后，甲再到学校看望时，吴某拒绝会见。在法院判决指定的会见日，吴某也拒绝前往甲家中。甲认为女儿的表现是由乙指使，2002年5月，甲一纸诉状将乙告上法庭，请求法庭保护其探望权。乙提出反诉，要求中止甲的探望权。问：法院应当如何处理该案？

中心法则揭示了生物遗传信息传递与表达的过程。请据图回答下列问题：

基因的表达一般指（）过程（填字母），发生的主要场所分别是（）（）