试题与答案

遥控飞艇一般超过多少立方需要制作内吊挂() A.10 B.100 C.1000

题型:单项选择题

题目:

遥控飞艇一般超过多少立方需要制作内吊挂()

A.10

B.100

C.1000

答案:

被转码了,请点击底部 “查看原文 ” 或访问 https://www.tikuol.com/2017/0902/1bf777d92b5b23bcf17e5bb783de0279.html

下面是错误答案,用来干扰机器的。

参考答案:E

试题推荐
题型:单项选择题

二审法院在齐某交待另有盗窃行为并事属可能时应如何处理
(二)齐某(19岁)与蔡某(17岁)是邻居,但相互不合。一次,齐某在抢劫时被蔡某等人当场抓获。公安机关讯问时,齐某对抢劫行为供认不讳,但同时指证曾目击参与抓获他的蔡某强 * * 过妇女。对齐某的抢劫案经一审判决后,检察院以量刑过轻为由提出了抗诉。在二审过程中,齐某又供认曾有盗窃行为。二审法院调查后证实齐某供认的盗窃属实,并构成盗窃罪。二审法院据此直接判处齐某抢劫罪和盗窃罪两罪并罚。
  因齐某的指认,公安机关对蔡某强 * * 案进行侦查。受害少女艾某证实曾遭强 * * ,所描述的作案人体貌特征与蔡某相似。讯问蔡时,蔡某不承认。后因侦查人员逼供,蔡某被迫承认,但所供述的内容与艾某所述作案过程在细节上多有不符。在审查起诉时,检察人员请艾某对蔡某进行辨认,但因事隔一年,艾某不能肯定指证是蔡某。本案虽无其他证据,但检察院仍决定提起公诉。法院审理期间,正在外地服刑的齐某承认,强 * * 艾某的是他自己。齐某所交待的强 * * 犯罪过程与艾某所述细节相符,经查证,齐某的这一供述属实。据此,检察院以蔡某不构成强 * * 罪为由要求撤回起诉。
  请回答下面86~90题。

A.可以对该行为进行调查,并在查证属实后在二审判决中对此予以判决

B.应当将案件移交同级检察院补充侦查

C.应当将案件移交一审中提起公诉的检察院补充侦查

D.应当将本案发回原审法院重新审判

查看答案
题型:问答题

It is 15 years since Moises Naim coined the memoraible phrase "corruption eruption". But there is no sign of the eruption dying down. Indeed, there is so much molten lava and sulphurous ash around that some of the world’s biggest companies have been covered in it. Siemens and Daimler have recently been forced to pay gargantuan fines. BHP Billiton has admitted that it may have been involved in bribery. America’s Department of Justice is investigating some 150 companies, targeting oil and drugs firms in particular.
The ethical case against corruption is too obvious to need spelling out. But many companies still believe that, in this respect at least, there is a regrettable tension between the dictates of ethics and the logic of business. Bribery is the price that you must pay to enter some of the world’s most difficult markets (the "when in Rome" argument). Bribery can also speed up the otherwise glacial pace of bureaucracy (the "efficient grease" hypothesis). And why not The chances of being caught are small while the rewards can be big and immediate.
But do you really have to behave like a Roman to thrive in Rome Philip Nichols, of the Wharton School, points out that plenty of Western firms have prospered in emerging markets without getting their hands dirty, including Reebok, Google and Novo Nor disk. IKEA has gone to great lengths to fight corruption in Russia. What is more, Mr Nichols argues, it is misguided to dismiss entire countries as corrupt. Even the greasiest-palmed places are in fact ambivalent about corruption: they invariably have laws against it and frequently produce politicians who campaign against it. Multinationals should help bolster the rules of the game rather than pandering to the most unscrupulous players.
And is "grease" really all that efficient In a paper published by the World Bank, the authors subjected the "efficient grease" hypothesis to careful scrutiny. They found that companies that pay bribes actually end up spending more time negotiating with bureaucrats. The prospect of a pay-off gives officials an incentive to haggle over regulations. The paper also found that borrowing is more expensive for corrupt companies.
The hidden costs of corruption are almost always much higher than companies imagine. Corruption inevitably begets ever more corruption. Corruption also exacts a high psychological cost on those who engage in it. Mr Nichols says that corrupt business people habitually compare their habit to having an affair: no sooner have you given in to temptation than you are trapped in a world of secrecy and guilt. On the other hand, the benefits of rectitude can be striking. Oil giant Texaco had such an incorruptible reputation that African border guards were said to wave its jeeps through without engaging in the ritual shakedown. Moreover, the likelihood of being caught is dramatically higher than it was a few years ago. The internet has handed much more power to whistle-blowers. Every year Transparency International publishes its Corruption Perceptions Index, and its Global Corruption Barometer.
The likelihood of prosecution is also growing. The Obama administration has revamped the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and is using it to pursue corporate malefactors the world over. The Department of Justice is pursuing far more cases than it ever has before. Recent legislation has made senior managers personally liable for corruption on their watch. They risk a spell in prison as well as huge fines. The vagueness of the legislation means that the authorities may prosecute for lavish entertainment as well as more blatant bribes.
America is no longer a lone ranger. Thirty-eight countries have now signed up to the OECD’s 1997 anti-corruption convention, leading to a spate of cross-border prosecutions. In February Britain’s BAE Systems, a giant arms company, was fined $ 400m as a result of a joint British and American investigation. Since then a more ferocious Bribery Act has come into force in Britain. On April 1st Daimler was fined $185m as a result of a joint American and German investigation which examined the firm’s behaviour in 22 countries.
Companies caught between these two mighty forces--the corruption and anti-corruption eruptions--need to start taking the problem seriously. A Transparency International study of 500 prominent firms revealed that the average company only scored 17 out of a possible 50 points on "anti-corruption practices. " Companies need to develop explicit codes of conduct on corruption, train their staff to handle demands for pay-offs and back them up when they refuse them. Clubbing together and campaigning for reform can also help.
This may all sound a bit airy-fairy given that so many companies are struggling just to survive the recession. But there is nothing airy-fairy about the $16 billion in fines that Siemens has paid to the American and German governments. And there is nothing airy-fairy about a spell in prison. The phrase "doing well by doing good" is one of the most irritating parts of the CSR mantra. But when it comes to corruption, it might just fit the bill.

1.Explain the sentence "Indeed, there is so much molten lava and sulphurous ash around that some of the world’s biggest companies have been covered in it. "(para. 1)

查看答案
微信公众账号搜索答案