药物的半衰期长，则表明该药 A．作用快 B．作用强 C．代谢快 D．排泄快 E．消除

重症联合免疫缺陷病有（）

A.DiGeorge综合征

B.XSCID

C.WAS

D.Bruton综合征

E.ATS

下述使用阿托品解救有机磷中毒的注意事项中，正确的是（）

A.阿托品中毒给予颠茄碱可拮抗

B.轻度与中度有机磷中毒可单用阿托品解救

C.应用阿托品宜"早期、足量、重复给药"

D.重度有机磷中毒必须同时应用阿托品与解磷定等

E.中毒者病情缓解或达到"阿托品化"后改为维持量

喉阻塞临床分度和治疗？

下列项目中，应通过“以前年度损益调整”科目核算的有( )。

A．发现与以前期间损益相关的前期差错

B．涉及损益的资产负债表日后调整事项

C．涉及利润分配的资产负债表日后调整事项

D．会计政策变更事项

E．会计估计变更事项

When it comes to suing doctors, Philadelphia is hardly the city of brotherly love. A combination of sprightly lawyers and sympathetic juries has made Philadelphia a hotspot for medical-malpractice lawsuits. Since 1995, Pennsylvania state courts have awarded an average of $ 2m in such cases, according to Jury Verdict Research, a survey firm. Some medical specialists have seen their malpractice insurance premiums nearly double over the past year. Obstetricians are now paying up to $104,000 a year to protect themselves.

The insurance industry is largely to blame. Carol Golin, the Monitor’s editor, argues that in the 1990s insurers tried to grab market share by offering artificially low rates (betting that any losses would be covered by gains on their investments). The stock-market correction, coupled with the large legal awards, has eroded the insurers’ reserves. Three in Pennsylvania alone have gone bust.

A few doctors--particularly older ones--will quit. The rest are adapting. Some are abandoning litigation-prone procedures, such as delivering babies. Others are moving parts of their practice to neighboring states where insurance rates are lower. Some from Pennsylvania have opened offices in New Jersey. New doctors may also be deterred from setting up shop in litigation havens, however prestigious.

Despite a Republican president, tort reform has got nowhere at the federal level. Indeed doctors could get clobbered indirectly by a Patients’ Bill of Rights, which would further expose managed care companies to lawsuits. This prospect has fuelled interest among doctors in Pennsylvania’s new medical malpractice reform bill, which was signed into law on March 20th. It will, among other things, give doctors $ 40m of state funds to offset their insurance premiums, spread the payment of awards out over time and prohibit individuals from double dipping--that is, suing a doctor for damages that have already been paid by their health insurer.

But will it really help Randall Bovbjerg, a health policy expert at the Urban Institute, argues that the only proper way to slow down the litigation machine would be to limit the compensation for pain and suffering, so-called "non-monetary damages". Needless to say, a fixed cap on such awards is resisted by most trial lawyers. But Mr Bovbjerg reckons a more nuanced approach, with a sliding scale of payments based on well-defined measures of injury, is a better way forward. In the meantime, doctors and insurers are bracing themselves for a couple more rough years before the insurance cycle turns.

Nobody disputes that hospital staff make mistakes: a 1999 Institute of Medicine report claimed that errors kill at least 44,000 patients a year. But there is little evidence that malpractice lawsuits on their own will solve the problem.

To which of the following is the author most likely to agree（）

A. The proper way is to slow down payments for injuries

B. Juries tended to find fault with the compensations paid

C.Low insurance rates are to blame for the potential trouble

D. Legal procedures alone may not solve the rough problem