患者，女，50岁，已婚。近3天带下量多，色黄，质稀，有味，妇科检查：带下量多，黄绿色

Passage Three

The age at which young children begin to make moral discriminations about harmful actions committed against themselves or others has been the focus of recent research into the moral development of children. Until recently, child psychologists supported pioneer developmentalist Jean Piaget in his hypothesis that because of their immaturity, children under age seven do not take into account the intentions of a person committing accidental or deliberate harm, but rather simply assign punishment for transgressions on the basis of the magnitude of the negative consequences causeD. According to Piaget, children under age seven occupy the first stage of moral development, which is characterized by moral absolutism (rules made by authorities must be obeyed) and imminent justice (if rules are broken, punishment will be meted out). Until young children mature, their moral judgments are based entirely on the effect rather than the cause of a transgression. However, in recent research, Keasey found that six-year-old children not only distinguish between accidental and intentional harm, but also judge intentional harm as naughtier, regardless of the amount of damage produced. Both of these findings seem to indicate that children, at an earlier age than Piaget claimed, advance into the second stage of moral development, moral autonomy, in which they accept social rules but view them as more arbitrary than do children in the first stage.

Keasey’s research raises two key questions for developmental psychologists about children under age seven: do they recognize justifications for harmful actions, and do they make distinctions between harmfulacts that are preventable and those acts that have unforeseen harmful consequences Studies indicate that justifications excusing harmful actions might include public duty, serf-defense, and provocation. For example, Nesdale and Rule concluded that children were capable of considering whether or not an aggressor’s action was justified by public duty: five year olds reacted very differently to "Bonnie wrecks Arm’s pretend house" depending on whether Bonnie did it "so somebody won’t fall over it" or because Bonnie wanted "to make Ann feel bad". Thus, a child of five begins to understand that certain harmful actions, though intentional, can be justified; the constraints of moral absolutism no longer solely guide their judgments.

Psychologists have determined that during kindergarten children learn to make subtle distinctions involving harm. Darley observed that among acts involving unintentional harm, six-year-old children just entering kindergarten could not differentiate between foreseeable, and thus preventable, harm and unforeseeable harm for which the perpetrator cannot be blamed. Seven months later, however, Darley found that these same children could make both distinctions, thus demonstrating that they had become morally autonomous.

Which of the following best describes the passage as a whole ？（）

A．An outline for future research

B．An expanded definition of commonly misunderstood terms

C．An analysis of a dispute between two theories

D．A discussion of research findings in an ongoing inquiry

消费者权益保护法所保护的消费者权益包括（）。

A.人身利益

B.财产权利

C.胜诉权

D.知情权

表面缺陷一般会产生尖锐、清晰的图像显示，但（）缺陷产生的图像显示则不如表面开口缺陷清晰

保险的实质是( )。

A．以极小的代价换取最大的安全

B．达到风险转移的目的

C．赚取保费

D．减少自己可能承担的损失

胸片示单侧胸腔密度均匀性增高，则可除外下列哪种疾病（）

A.一侧张力性气胸

B.一侧大量胸腔积液

C.一侧肺不张

D.一侧肺实变

E.一侧肺切除