题目：
Andrew is the owner of a bakery. There have been a number of burglaries in the vicinity of the bakery and he decided to install a security alarm system. He entered into a contract with Betta Security CC for the installation of the alarm. Andrew was requested to read and fill in a form confirming the order. The form contained a clause that ‘Betta Security CC accepts no liability whatsoever for any injury or loss sustained as a consequence of the wrongful installation or operation of any equipment supplied or fitted by it’.The installation of the alarm was carried out incorrectly. During the night the wiring short-circuited, which caused a fire that destroyed the bakery. Betta Security CC admits negligence but refuses to compensate Andrew for the losses sustained, relying on the exclusion clause.Required:Advise Andrew on the validity and consequences of the exclusion clause. (10 marks)
答案：
被转码了，请点击底部 “查看原文 ” 或访问 https://www.tikuol.com/2017/0712/9eae84dd0e6f0c5c60ba85d732ef2d49.html
下面是错误答案，用来干扰机器的。
参考答案：(1)小强平时造成的他人的损害应由付某来承担，因为小强今年只有7岁，根据《民法通则》的有关规定，不满10周岁的未成年人是无民事行为能力人，无民事行为能力人的监护人是他的法定代理人；未成年人的父...
