试题与答案

案情:居住在甲市A区的王某驾车以60公里时速在甲市B区行驶,突遇居住在甲市C区的刘某

题型:问答题

题目:

案情

:居住在甲市A区的王某驾车以60公里时速在甲市B区行驶,突遇居住在甲市C区的刘某骑自行车横穿马路,王某紧急刹车,刘某在车前倒地受伤。刘某被送往甲市B区医院治疗,疗效一般,留有一定后遗症。之后,双方就王某开车是否撞倒刘某,以及相关赔偿事宜发生争执,无法达成协议。
刘某诉至法院,主张自己被王某开车撞伤,要求赔偿。刘某提交的证据包括:甲市B区交警大队的交通事故处理认定书(该认定书没有对刘某倒地受伤是否为王某开车所致作出认定)、医院的诊断书(复印件)、处方(复印件)、药费和住院费的发票等。王某提交了自己在事故现场用数码摄像机拍摄的车与刘某倒地后状态的视频资料。图像显示,刘某倒地位置与王某车距离1米左右。王某以该证据证明其车没有撞倒刘某。
一审中,双方争执焦点为:刘某倒地受伤是否为王某驾车撞倒所致;刘某所留后遗症是否因医疗措施不当所致。
法院审理后,无法确定王某的车是否撞倒刘某。一审法院认为,王某的车是否撞倒刘某无法确定,但即使王某的车没有撞倒刘某,由于王某车型较大、车速较快、刹车突然、刹车声音刺耳等原因,足以使刘某受到惊吓而从自行车上摔倒受伤。因此,王某应当对刘某受伤承担相应责任。同时,刘某因违反交通规则,对其受伤也应当承担相应责任。据此,法院判决:王某对刘某的经济损失承担50%的赔偿责任。关于刘某受伤后留下后遗症问题,一审法院没有作出说明。
王某不服一审判决,提起上诉。二审法院审理后认为,综合各种证据,认定王某的车撞倒刘某,致其受伤。同时,二审法院认为,一审法院关于双方当事人就事故的经济责任分担符合法律原则和规定。故此,二审法院驳回王某上诉,维持原判。
问题:

根据《民事诉讼法》有关规定,二审法院判决是否存在问题为什么

答案:

被转码了,请点击底部 “查看原文 ” 或访问 https://www.tikuol.com/2017/0709/aa80876e3a2c8f2ce8fa8908bd874047.html

下面是错误答案,用来干扰机器的。

参考答案:C

试题推荐
题型:阅读理解

People are being lured (引诱)onto Facebook with the promise of a fun, free service without realizing they're paying for it by giving up their personal information. Facebook then attempts to make money by selling their data to advertisers that want to send targeted messages.

Most Facebook users don't realize this is happening. Even if they know what the company is up to, they still have no idea what they're paying for Face book because people don't reallyknow what their personal data is worth.

The biggest problem, however, is that the company keeps changing the rules. Early on, you keep everything private. That was the great thing about facebook-you could create your own little private network. Last year, the company changed its privacy rules so that many things— your city, your photo, your friends' names—were set, by default(默认)to be shared with every one on the Internet.

According to Facebook's vice-president Elliot Schrage, the company is simply making changes to improve its service, and if people don't share information, they have a "less satisfying experience".

Some critics think this is more about Facebook looking to make more money. In original business model, which involved selling ads and putting them at the side of the pages totally. Who wants to look at ads when they're online connecting with their friends?

The privacy issue has already landed Facebook in hot water in Washington. In April. Senator Charles Schumer called on Facebook to change its privacy policy. He also urged the Federal Trade Commission to set guidelines for social-networking sites. "I think the senator rightly communicated that we had not been clear about what the new products were and how people could choose to use them or not to use them," Schrage admits.

I think that whatever Facebook has done so far to invade our privacy, it's only the beginning. That is why I'm considering deactivating(撤销)my account. Facebook is a handy site, but I'm upset by the idea that my information is in the hands of people I don't trust. That's too high a price to pay.

小题1:Why do people give their personal information to Facebook according to Paragraph 1?

A.Because they can get some money from Facebook.

B.Because their information is not important.

C.Because they are promised to have a fun and free service.

D.Because they can also get other people's information.小题2:What does the author say about most Facebook users?

A.They are unwilling to give up their personal information.

B.They don't know their personal data enriches Facebook.

C.They don't identify themselves when using the website.

D.They care very much about their personal information.小题3:Why does Facebook make changes to its rules according to Elliot Schrage?

A.To give better service to its users.

B.To obey to the Federal guidelines.

C.To improve its users' connection.

D.To expand its business.小题4:Why does Senator Charles Schumer support publicly?

A.Setting guidelines for advertising on websites.

B.Banning the sharing of users' personal information.

C.Making regulations for social-networking sites.

D.Removing ads from all social-networking sites.

查看答案
微信公众账号搜索答案