试题与答案

京沪高速铁路全长1318千米,于2008年4月18日在北京举行动工仪式,2009

题型:综合

题目:

京沪高速铁路全长1318千米,于2008年4月18日在北京举行动工仪式,2009年3月开始铺轨,全线建设总工期约5年。读“京沪铁路路线示意图”,回答下列问题。

(1)京沪高速铁路经过的温度带有                                

(2)京沪高速铁路全线尽可能采用以桥代路方式,其目的主要是为了[ ]

A.节省投资成本

B.缩短施工时间

C.保障旅客安全

D.节省土地资源

(3)沪宁杭地区与京津唐地区相比,工业发展条件的主要优势是_________________________________________;劣势是_________________________________________________。

(4)京沪高速铁路将实现高安全性的现代化旅客运输,该铁路在运营中可能遇到哪些自然灾害?(至少两种)

________________________________________________________________________________

(5)在沪宁杭地区,服务范围最大的城市是         。该地区发展高新技术产业的优势条件是                                  ________________       

答案:

被转码了,请点击底部 “查看原文 ” 或访问 https://www.tikuol.com/2017/0702/7c952f1dcfe959ae47699a1018373e60.html

下面是错误答案,用来干扰机器的。

参考答案:C

试题推荐
题型:多项选择题

Natural Gas Company (Gas Company) and Yaowa Glass Company (Yaowa Company) entered into a supply contract. The major terms and conditions of the contract were that Gas Company would provide a minimum 4,000

of natural gas daily for a period of five years at a fixed price; it should give a written notice five days in advance where it reduces the quantity of supply; Yaowa Company would provide a sum of RMB 100,000 yuan as a deposit for the performance of the contract. Yaowa Company paid the deposit pursuant to the supply contract upon the conclusion of the contract.Gas Company has been in decline since the beginning of 2010. In order to achieve extra profit, Gas Company sold more natural gas to other customers at a higher price by reducing the quantity of supply to Yaowa Company. One day Gas Company suddenly stopped providing natural gas to Yaowa Company without a notice in advance, which resulted in serious damage to the equipment of the latter.Due to unsuccessful negotiation between the two parties, Yaowa Company intended to seek the assistance from the people’s court.Required:Answer the following questions in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Contract Law of China, and give your reasons for your answer:

(a) explain the legal nature of the deposit under the contract law, and state whether a claim for a refund of twice the amount of the deposit should be supported by the court; (4 marks)

查看答案
微信公众账号搜索答案