尿常规检查提示慢性肾衰的是（） A.大量颗粒管型 B.蜡样管型 C.大量上皮细胞 D

林女士，34岁，1-0-2-1，既往月经规律，月经量正常。放置宫内节育器3个月，放置术后即出现经期出血，经量较前增多，前来就诊。妇科B超检查：子宫正常大小，宫腔内可见节育器，位置正常，双附件未见异常。向受术者正确的解释是（）。

A.可能她不适合放置宫内节育器

B.属于放环后最初1、2个月可出现的正常现象

C.属于手术感染的表现

D.属于宫内节育器异位的表现

E.属于宫内节育器嵌入子宫肌层的现象

       邹忌修八尺有余，而形貌昳丽。朝服衣冠，窥镜，谓其妻曰：“我孰与城北徐公美？”其妻曰：“君美甚，徐公何能及君也？”城北徐公者，齐国之美丽者也。忌不自信，而复问其妾曰：“吾孰与徐公美？”妾曰：“徐公何能及君也！”旦日，客从外来，与坐谈，曰：“吾与徐公孰美？”客曰：“徐公不若君之美也。”明日，徐公来，孰视之，自以为不如；窥镜而自视，又弗如远甚。暮寝而思之，曰：“吾妻之美我者，私我也；妾之美我者，畏我也；客之美我者，欲有求于我也。” 于是入朝见威王。曰：“臣诚知不如徐公美。臣之妻私臣，臣之妾畏臣，臣之客欲有求于臣，皆以美于徐公。今齐地方千里，百二十城，宫妇左右莫不私王，朝廷之臣莫不畏王，四境之内莫不有求于王。由此观之，王之蔽甚矣！” 王曰：“善！”乃下令：“群臣吏民，有面刺寡人之过者，受上赏；上书谏寡人者，受中赏；能谤讥于市朝，闻寡人之耳者，受下赏。”令初下，群臣进谏，门庭若市。数月之后，时时而间进，期年之后，虽欲言，无可进者。燕、赵、韩、魏闻之，皆朝于齐。此所谓战胜于朝廷。

1、下列句中画线词解释有误的一项是[ ]

    A、邹忌讽齐王纳谏（用委婉的语言劝告）    臣之妻私臣（偏爱）

    B、能谤讥于市朝（指责）    臣诚知不如徐公美（的确，实在）

    C、今齐地方千里（指齐国的地方）     时时而间进（偶而） 

    D、邹忌修八尺有余（指身高）    群臣吏民，有面刺寡人之过者，受上赏(当面)

2、下列句子中，画线词的含义完全相同的一项是[ ]

    A、于是入朝见威王    皆朝于齐 

    B、吾孰与徐公美    徐公来，孰视之

    C、王之蔽甚矣    蔽林见窥之

    D、自以为不如    以为妙绝

3、下列对课文理解有误的一项是[ ]

     A、邹忌的妻、妾、客都说他比徐公美。他也“窥镜而自视”，陶醉于这些溢美之词之中，于是，就“入朝见威王”，劝威王要广开言路，虚心纳谏，让人们都敢于说真话，这样才能实现大治。

     B、邹忌的讽谏是从生活小事出发，以小比大，以家比国，寓治国之道于形象的比喻之中，贴切自然，入情入理。

     C、邹忌在听到妻妾客的赞美之后的反应是“忌不自信、暮寝而思之”说明了邹忌是一个善于思考、实事求是的人。

     D、本文记叙的是邹忌从与徐公比美中悟出治国的道理，进而讽劝齐王纳谏，使齐国大治的故事。

4、翻译下列句子。

（1）君美甚，徐公何能及君也？

   译：                                                                                                  

（2）臣诚知不如徐公美。臣之妻私臣，臣之妾畏臣，臣之客欲有求于臣，皆以美于徐公。

   译：                                                                                                                                                   

技术出口的会计核算——企业提供技术服务。甲公司于2004年9月为A国企业设计工程项目，设计费为50万美元，期限为6个月，合同规定A国企业预付设计费5万美元，余款在设计完成后支付。至2004年12月31日，已发生成本200万元(假定为设计人员工资)。预计完成该设计项目还将发生成本120万元。2004年12月31日，经专业人员测评，设计工厂已完成75%。美元中间价为1:8.15，假定期内无变动。A国征收的预提所得税税率为10%，则：
2004年确认收入=劳务总收入×劳务的完成程度-以前年度已确认的收入=USD 500000×8.15×75%-0=3056250(元)
2004年确认费用=劳务总成本×劳务的完成程度-以前年度已确认的成本=(2000000+1200000)×75%-0=2400000(元)
作会计分录。

The collapse of Enron, the largest bankruptcy in American history, has rung out a banner year for American business failures. In Europe, the fallout from the Swissair and Sabena insolvencies continues. In the current global slump, more companies are likely to go under. Now is a perfect time to reconsider how to handle such failures: let them sink, or give them a chance to swim

In America, bankruptcy has come to mean a second chance for bust businesses. The famous "Chapter 11" law aims to give a company time to get back on its feet, by shielding it from debt payments and prodding banks to negotiate with their debtor. It even allows an insolvent company to receive fresh finance after it goes bust. On the other side of the Atlantic, when companies stumble, almost as much effort is spent in fingering the guilty as in trying to salvage a viable business. British and French laws, for example, can make a failing company’s directors face criminal penalties and personal liability. Moreover, bankers have the power, at the first sign of trouble, to push a company into the arms of the receivers. Some modest changes are afoot, however. Britain is considering moves that would bring its rules closer to America’s. New laws in Germany should also make it easier to revive sick companies, although trade unions still have their say.

But even with the arrival of the euro and moves towards a single financial market, going bust in Europe is a strictly local affair. Long before America had a single currency, the American constitution provided uniform bankruptcy laws, observes Elizabeth Warren of the Harvard Law School. Europe’s patchwork of national laws, according to Bill Brandt of " Development Specialists", a consultancy, inhibits lending and makes it difficult to fix ailing firms.

Transatlantic insolvencies are even harder, as a Belgian-based software company, Lernout and Hauspie, discovered this year. Its American reorganization plan was thwarted by a Belgian judge, who ordered a sale of the firm’s assets. As the European Union inches toward greater harmonization, should it try to mimic America

Critics of Chapter 11 think not. They argue that America’s bankruptcy system is wasteful, lets failed managers go unpunished, and gives some companies an unfair advantage. In Chapter 11, admittedly, lawyers and advisers gobble up fees, but a recent study argues that the fees are no larger than those for most mergers and acquisitions. One common complaint, that managers enjoy the high life while creditors go begging, fails to stand up to the data from America’s previous wave of bankruptcies in the early 1990s. Stuart Gilson of the Harvard Business School found that more than two-thirds of top managers were ousted within two years of a bankruptcy filing. More troubling is that some American firms seem to enjoy second and third trips to bankruptcy court, cheekily termed Chapters 22 and 33. Some see this as evidence that, ton often, they use Chapter 11 to keep running. But there is more to the story.

The ease of Enron bankruptcy（）

A. triggers grand-scale economic recession in America

B. affects the Swissair and Sabena in Europe

C. marks the most dramatic economic situation in America

D. gets more companies into trouble around the world

人类基因组计划于（）年开始实施

A.1986；

B.1990；

C.1995；

D.2000；