大动作训练要做到（）。A、时间短、次数少  B、时间长、次数少  C、时间长次数多

阅读下列语段，完成习题。

　　余幼时即嗜学。家贫，无致书以观，每假借于藏书之家，手自笔录，计日以还。天大寒，观冰坚，手指不可屈伸，弗之怠。录毕，走送之，不敢稍逾约。以是人多以书假余，余因得遍观群书。　　

　　既加冠，益慕圣贤之道。又患无硕师名人与游，尝趋百里外从乡之先达执经叩问。先达德隆望尊，门人弟子填其室，未尝稍降辞色。余立侍左右，援疑质理，俯身倾耳以请；或遇其叱咄，色愈恭，礼愈至，不也出一言以复；俟其欣悦，则又请焉。故余虽愚，卒获有所闻。　　

1、解释下列句中的文言实词。　

①又患无硕师________________　　　

②每假借于藏书之家________________　　　

③俟其欣悦________________　　

2、下列句中文言虚词“以”的用法与例句相同的一项是（　　　）　　　

例句：无从致书以观　　　　

A、以是人多以书假余　　　　

B、计日以还　　　　

C、俯身耳以请　　

3、下列选项中的文言句式与“弗之怠”一句相同的一项是（　　　）　　　

A、每假借于藏书之家　　　

B、何陋之有　　　

C、马之千里者　　

4、翻译下列句子。　　　

①以是人多以书假余，余因得遍观群书。_________________________________________________。　

②余立侍左右，援疑质理。____________________________________________________________。

5、本文第一段写“我”求学时_________________________的精神，第二段写求师时________________________________的态度。　

男，45岁，半年来进行性步态不稳，走路有踩棉花感。体检双下肢运动觉、振动觉消失，昂白（Romberg）征阳性，巴宾斯基（Babinski）征阴性。病变定位在（）

A.小脑

B.锥体外系

C.脊髓后索

D.内囊

E.前庭神经

我国的建设工程监理属于国际上( )项目管理的范畴。

A．施工方
B．业主方
C．供货方
D．设计方

在综合性经济技术指标产生差异时，可以把综合性经济技术指标分解为经济要素，然后分别测定各个要素变动对综合性经济指标差异影响程度的一种分析方法。这种方法属于( )。

A．比较分析法

B．平衡分析法

C．比率分析法

D．因素分析法

In most parts of the world, climate change is a worrying subject. Not so in California. At a recent gathering of green luminaries—in a film star’s house, naturally, for that is how seriousness is often established in Los Angeles—the dominant note was self-satisfaction at what the state has already achieved. And perhaps nobody is more complacent than Arnold Schwarzenegger. Unlike A1 Gore, a presidential candidate turned prophet of environmental doom, California’s governor sounds cheerful when talking about climate change. As well he might: it has made his political career.

Although California has long been an environmentally-conscious state, until recently greens were concerned above all with smog and redwood trees. "Coast of Dreams", Kevin Stag’s authoritative history of contemporary California, published in 2004, does not mention climate change. In that year, though, the newly-elected Mr. Schwarzenegger made his first tentative call for western states to seek alternatives to fossil fuels. Gradually he noticed that his efforts to tackle climate change met with less resistance, and more acclaim, than just about all his other policies. These days it can seem as though he works on nothing else.

Mr. Schwarzenegger’s transformation from screen warrior to eco-warrior was completed last year when he signed a bill imposing legally-enforceable limits on greenhouse—gas emissions—a first for America. Thanks mostly to its lack of coal and heavy industry, California is a relatively clean state. If it were a country it would be the world’s eighth-biggest economy, but only its 16th-biggest polluter. Its big problem is transport—meaning, mostly, cars and trucks, which account for more than 40% of its greenhouse-gas emissions compared with 32% in America as a whole. The state wants to ratchet down emissions limits on new vehicles, beginning in 2009. Mr. Schwarzenegger has also ordered that, by 2020, vehicle fuel must produce 10% less carbon: in the production as well as the burning, so a simple switch to corn-based ethanol is probably out.

Thanks in part to California’ s example, most of the western states have adopted climate action plans. When it comes to setting emission targets, the scene can resemble a posedown at a Mr. Olympia contest. Arizona’s climate-change scholars decided to set a target of cutting the state’s emissions to 2000 levels by 2020. But Janet Napolitano, the governor, was determined not to be out-muscled by California. She has declared that Arizona will try to return to 2000 emission levels by 2012.

California has not just inspired other states; it has created a vanguard that ought to be able to prod the federal government into per national standards than it would otherwise consider. But California is finding it easier to export its policies than to put them into practice at home. In one way, California’ s self-confidence is fully justified. It has done more than any other state—let alone the federal government—to fix America’s attention on climate change. It has also made it seem as though the problem can be solved. Which is why failure would be such bad news. At the moment California is a beacon to other states. If it fails, it will become an excuse for inaction.

It can be inferred from the text that（）

A. California needs further actions to inspire other states

B. California has set a perfect model for other states to follow

C. California will become an excuse for inaction for other states

D. California might find it difficult to execute its own policies