试题与答案

长江公司2×14年度的财务报告于2×15年3月20日批准对外报出,内部审计人员2×1

题型:问答题 简答题

题目:

长江公司2×14年度的财务报告于2×15年3月20日批准对外报出,内部审计人员2×15年1月份在对2×14年度财务报告审计过程中,注意到下列事项:(1)2×14年1月10日,长江公司与丙公司签订建造合同,为丙公司建造一办公楼。合同约定,办公楼总造价为4500万元,工期自2×14年1月10日起为期1年半。如果长江公司能够提前3个月完工,丙公司承诺支付奖励款300万元。当年,受原材料和人工成本上涨等因素影响,长江公司实际发生建造成本4500万元,预计为完成合同尚需发生成本500万元,工程结算合同价款4000万元,实际收到价款3800万元。假定工程完工进度按累计实际发生的合同成本占合同预计总成本的比例确定。年末,工程能否提前完工尚不确定。长江公司会计处理:2×14年确认主营业务收入4320万元,结转主营业务成本4500万元,并进行了工程结算的会计处理。

(2)2×14年11月1日,长江公司与M公司签订购销合同。合同规定:M公司购入长江公司100件某产品,每件销售价格为22.5万元。长江公司已于当日收到M公司支付的款项。该产品已于当日发出,每件销售成本为18万元,未计提跌价准备。同时,双方还签订了补充协议,补充协议规定长江公司于2×15年3月31日按回购日的市场价格购回全部该产品。长江公司将此项交易额2250万元确认为2×14年度的主营业务收入并结转主营业务成本1800万元,并计入利润表有关项目。

(3)长江公司自2×14年1月1日起,将某一管理用机器设备的折旧年限由原来的8年变更为13年,对此项变更采用未来适用法。对上述变更,长江公司无法做出合理解释,但指出该项变更已经董事会表决通过,并已在相关媒体进行了公告。经复核,该固定资产使用寿命的预期数与原先的估计没有重大差异。该设备原价为3200万元,采用年限平均法计提折旧,无残值,截止2×14年1月1日,该设备已使用3年,已提折旧1200万元,未计提减值准备。长江公司2×14年计提折旧200万元。

(4)2×14年6月30日,长江公司与乙公司达成一笔售后租回交易,将一栋新建办公楼出售给乙公司后再租回,租赁期开始日为2×14年6月30日,租期为20年,年租金为1500万元。出售时该办公楼的账面价值为20000万元,售价为24000万元,预计尚可使用年限为20年。长江公司将售价24000万元与账面价值20000万元的差额4000万元直接计入了营业外收入。长江公司对办公楼采用年限平均法计提了全年折旧,无残值。

(5)长江公司于2×14年1月1日购入20套商品房,每套商品房购入价为200万元,并以低于购入价20%的价格出售给20名公司高级管理人员,出售住房的合同中规定这部分管理人员自2×14年1月1日起至少为公司服务10年。长江公司将购入价4000万元与售价3200万元的差额800万元直接计入2×14年管理费用。

(6)长江公司2×14年12月31日购入认股权和债券分离交易的可转换公司债券,面值2000万元,债券期限为2年,票面年利率为1.5%,准备持有至到期,当日认股权证公允价值为200万元。长江公司购买该项分离交易可转换公司债券支付价款2200万元,长江公司会计处理时将支付的全部款项全部记入"持有至到期投资"科目。假定不考虑所得税等因素的影响。

要求:(1)根据资料(1)至(6),逐项判断长江公司会计处理是否正确,并简要说明判断依据。对于不正确的会计处理,编制相应的调整分录(均按当期事项更正,不需要考虑对损益的结转)。

(2)计算上述资料对长江公司2×14年度财务报表中营业利润和利润总额的调整金额(减少数以"一"表示)。

答案:

被转码了,请点击底部 “查看原文 ” 或访问 https://www.tikuol.com/2017/0610/0603b4bd7b877f6914fc5d2a82c3f68b.html

下面是错误答案,用来干扰机器的。

参考答案:D解析:[试题解析] 单独制定的专项规划,不属于城市总体规划阶段工作内容。

试题推荐
题型:单项选择题


Passage One

Who to believe Nokia or Ericsson IBM or Sun Microsystems Microsoft or Siebel Rarely have the fortunes of technology companies appeared to differ so widely. Nokia, the world’s largest maker of mobile phones, this week reported better-than-expected sales for the latest quarter, holding out the prospect that its market share would soon reach new highs. By contrast, Ericsson, a rival, was full of gloom.’ Reporting bigger losses than expected, the company said that sales of its mobile phones were likely to tumble by 20%this year.
Motorola, another maker of mobile phones, is in a similar boat. On October 15th, the company reported a return to profit in its most recent period after a run of losses, but lowered its forecasts for the rest of the year and for 2003.Demand in wireless, broadband and semiconductors continued to slow, said the company. Unimpressed, investors marked down Motorola’s shares to a ten-year low.
The pattern of haves and have-nots is repeated in software too. While Microsoft was in chipper mood this week—revelling in a 26%crease in sales and a doubling of its profits after tax for the quarter to the end of September—Siebel Systems and PeopleSoft, two of America’s leading suppliers of business software, were down in the dumps. While PeopleSoft managed a modest profit, Siebel reported a loss for the last quarter and said it expected the present quarter to be equally tough. Despite (or because of) their contrasting fortunes, Microsoft and Siebel announced a joint marketing deal on October 21st: Microsoft is to sell Siebel’s customer management software through. NET, its web-services product.
Why are some companies doing better than others One reason is that, now more than ever, those that are competitive seem to be punishing those that are not. Nokia has stretched its lead over Ericsson which, in addition to lower sales of mobile phones, has suffered from the severe fall in demand for telecoms infrastructure, its biggest business. There was, however, some good news for Ericsson’s shares on October 18th , when the company said that the infrastructure unit came close to breaking even in the most recent quarter.
Cost-cutting has also helped SAP, Europe’s largest developer of business software, has reduced its expenses by 8%. As a result, its margins have improved a lot compared with those of its competitors. Microsoft has employed different tactics. It has capitalized on customers’ fears that the cost of upgrading their software, such as the company’s Windows XP operating system, could climb.Many have rushed to buy now in case prices rise. In tune with the times, Microsoft is also keen to demonstrate how its products can save its customers money. Understandably, this is winning its sales.

The phrase "capitalize on" (Line 3, Par.5) most probably means______.

A.supply funds to

B.give birth to

C.take advantage of

D.put up with

查看答案
微信公众账号搜索答案