减轻或消除药物毒性的方法有（）。 A.炮制规范严格 B.掌握煎药方法 C.注

我国对外贸易经营者的管理，登记和核准制。（）

社会工作者在实践中面临的主要伦理困境有()。

A.价值评估问题

B.自我决定问题

C.服务转介问题

D.价值介入问题

E.文化背景问题

华东理工大学网络教育的学习方针是（）

A.网上自主学习、卫星直播授课、集中面授辅导、教师网络答疑

B.网上自主学习、卫星直播授课、集中面授辅导、教师网络答疑、注重过程考核

C.网上自主学习、集中面授辅导、教师网络答疑、注重过程考核

D.卫星直播授课、集中面授辅导、教师网络答疑、注重过程考核

如果存在如下过程：　　Private Function FMax(a( )As Integer)　　　Dim First As Integer，Last As Integer，i As Integer　　　First=LBound(A) 　　　Last=UBound(A) 　　　Max=a(First)　　　For i=First To Last　　　　If a(i) ＞ Max Then Max=a(i)　　　Next i　　　FMax=Max　　End Function　　在窗体上添加一个命令按钮，然后编写如下事件过程：　　Private Sub Command1 Click( )　　　　ReDim m(1 To 4) As Integer　　　　m(1)=20：m(2)=30：m(3)=50：m(4)=100　　　　c=FMax(m)　　　　Print c　　End Sub　　单击命令按钮，其输出结果为【 】。

For centuries people have been fighting over whether governments should allow trade between countries. There have been, and probably always will be, (1) to the argument. Some people argue that just (2) is best for both the country and the world. Others argue that trade with other countries (3) for some people to make a good living. Both sides are at least (4) .
International trade matters a lot. Its effects on (5) are enormous. Imagine a world in which your country (6) at all with other countries. Imagine what kind of job you would be (7) and what goods you could buy or not buy in such a world.
For the United States, for example, start by imagining that it lived without its (8) a year in imported oil, and cut back on its (9) because the remaining domestic oil and other energy sources were (10) . Producers and consumers in other parts of the economy would (11) if they were suddenly stripped of foreign-made goods like CD players and clothing. On the (12) side, suppose that Boeing could sell airplanes, and farmers could sell their crops, (13) the United States, and that U. S. universities could admit only (14) . In each case there are people who gain and people who lose from (15) international trade. In any case, less or more international trade will have (16) on your career as well as your life.
For years, American companies are often faced with the choice of buying (17) , which are expensive, and foreign-made goods, which are cheap. If the company buys American goods, it may (18) taxpayers by failing to keep prices low. But if it buys foreign goods, it may (19) the jobs of American workers. Recently, Congress has passed a law compelling American companies with government contracts to (20) domestic goods and services.

For centuries people have been fighting over whether governments should allow trade between countries. There have been, and probably always will be, (1) to the argument. Some people argue that just (2) is best for both the country and the world. Others argue that trade with other countries (3) for some people to make a good living. Both sides are at least (4) .
International trade matters a lot. Its effects on (5) are enormous. Imagine a world in which your country (6) at all with other countries. Imagine what kind of job you would be (7) and what goods you could buy or not buy in such a world.
For the United States, for example, start by imagining that it lived without its (8) a year in imported oil, and cut back on its (9) because the remaining domestic oil and other energy sources were (10) . Producers and consumers in other parts of the economy would (11) if they were suddenly stripped of foreign-made goods like CD players and clothing. On the (12) side, suppose that Boeing could sell airplanes, and farmers could sell their crops, (13) the United States, and that U. S. universities could admit only (14) . In each case there are people who gain and people who lose from (15) international trade. In any case, less or more international trade will have (16) on your career as well as your life.
For years, American companies are often faced with the choice of buying (17) , which are expensive, and foreign-made goods, which are cheap. If the company buys American goods, it may (18) taxpayers by failing to keep prices low. But if it buys foreign goods, it may (19) the jobs of American workers. Recently, Congress has passed a law compelling American companies with government contracts to (20) domestic goods and services.