甲已借用乙家具一套，现经双方协商，乙同意将家具卖给甲。于是两人决定终止借用合同，签订

患者中年女性，腹大坚满，皮色苍黄，腹壁青筋暴露2年，经中西药物综合治疗，病情尚稳定。近1周因感冒发烧引起腹部胀满加重，不欲食，恶心呕吐，吐出物为暗红色血液，大便色黑，舌红苔黄而干，脉弦数。

辨证属何型（）

A.肝脾血瘀

B.湿热蕴结

C.肝肾阴虚

D.臌胀出血

E.肝火上炎

护士小王护理一位住在隔离病房的患者，她的做法不正确的（）。

A.取下口罩，将污染面向内折叠

B.从指甲至前臂顺序刷手

C.隔离衣挂在走廊里，清洁面在外

D.从页面中间抓取避污纸

E.隔离衣每天更换消毒

文言文阅读（12分，每小题3分）

己所不欲，勿施于人

颜渊问仁。子曰：“克己复礼为仁。一日克己复礼，天下归仁焉。为仁由己，而由人乎哉？”颜渊曰：“请问其目？”子曰：“非礼勿视，非礼勿听，非礼勿言，非礼勿动。”颜渊曰：“回虽不敏，请事斯语矣。”

仲弓问仁。子曰：“出门如见大宾，使民如承大祭。己所不欲，勿施于人。在邦无怨，在家无怨。”仲弓曰：“雍虽不敏，请事斯语矣。”

樊迟问仁，子曰：“爱人。”问智，子曰：“知人。”樊迟未达。子曰：“举直措诸枉，能使枉者直。”樊迟退，见子夏曰：“向也吾见于夫子而问智，子曰：‘举直措诸枉，能使枉者直’，何谓也？”子夏曰：“富哉言乎！舜有天下，选于众，举皋陶，不仁者远矣。汤有天下，选于众，举伊尹，不仁者远矣。”

子贡问曰：“有一言而可以终身行之乎？”子曰“其‘恕’乎！己所不欲，勿施于人。”

子贡曰：“如有博施于民而能济众，何如？可谓仁乎？”子曰：“何事于仁，必也圣乎！尧舜其犹病诸！夫仁者，己欲立而立人，己欲达而达人。能近取譬，可谓仁之方也已。”

子曰：“仁远乎哉？我欲仁，斯仁至矣！”

曾子曰：“士不可以不弘毅，任重而道远。仁以为己任，不亦重乎？死而后已，不亦远乎？”

子曰：“志士仁人，无求生以害仁，有杀身以成仁。”

子曰：“不仁者，不可以久处约，不可以长处乐。仁者安仁，智者利仁。”

小题1:下列句中加点的字词解释有误的一项是(    )

A．请问其目目：详情。

B．尧舜其犹病诸诸：诸多。

C．不可以久处约约：贫困。

D．士不可以不弘毅弘：广大。小题2:下列加点词语的意义和用法完全相同的一项是(    )

A．一日克己复礼，天下归仁焉

夫子言之，与我心有戚戚焉

B．富哉言乎

天下事有难易乎

C．如有博施于民而能济众

君子博学而日参省乎己

D．无求生以害仁以其求思之深而无不再也

小题3:下列所给的句子中与所给例句句式相同的一项是(    )

例句：富哉言乎！

A．为汤武驱民者，桀与纣也。

B．善哉问也！

C．浴乎沂，风乎舞雩。

D．其何以行之哉？小题4:下列关于文段内容的理解和分析错误的一项是(    )

A．从孔子与樊迟的对话中可知，樊迟和孔子所说的“知”指的是知人善任。

B．子夏称赞说“富哉言乎”是因为他认为孔子的话含义深刻丰富。

C．孔子认为只有做到“克己”，让自己的德行完全合乎“礼”，并且能够“博施于民并且泛爱众”，才可以被称作“仁人”。

D．孔子提出要为“仁”的实现而献身，即“杀身以成仁”的观点，对后世产生很大的影响，与孟子的“舍生取义”是一致的。小题5:文言文翻译。（10分）

（1）夫子循循然善诱人，博我以文，约我以礼，欲罢不能。既竭吾才，如有所立卓尔。（4分）

（2）乐民之乐者，民亦乐其乐；忧民之忧者，民亦忧其忧。（3分）

（3）《诗》云：“刑于寡妻，至于兄弟，以御于家邦。”言举斯心加诸彼而已。（3分）

作为改进审计方与被审计方关系过程的一部分，如何看待内部审计是一件非常重要的事情。某些开展工作的态度类型将有助于这种看法。从一位管理人员的角度看，下列（）态度对于正面看法最具传导性。

A.客观的

B.调查式的

C.质问的

D.咨询式的

Questions 1～5

Writing articles about films for The Front Page was my first proper job. Before then I had done bits of reviewing—novels for other newspapers, films for a magazine and anything I was asked to do for the radio. That was how I met Tom Seaton, the first arts editor of The Front Page, who had also written for radio and television. He hired me, but Tom was not primarily a journalist, or he would certainly have been more careful in choosing his staff.
At first, his idea was that a team of critics should take care of the art forms that didn’t require specialized knowledge: books, TV, theatre, film and radio. There would be a weekly lunch at which we would make our choices from the artistic material that Tom had decided we should cover, though there would also be guests to make the atmosphere sociable.
It all felt a bit of a dream at that time: a new newspaper, and I was one of the team. It seemed so unlikely that a paper could he introduced into a crowded market. It seemed just as likely that a millionaire wanted to help me personally, and was pretending to employ me. Such was my lack of self-confidence. In fact, the first time I saw someone reading the newspaper on the London Underground, then turning to a page on which one of my reviews appeared, I didn’t know where to look.
Tom’s original scheme for a team of critics for the arts never took off. It was a good idea, but we didn’t get together as planned and so everything was done by phone. It turned out, too, that the general public out there preferred to associate a reviewer with a single subject area, and so I chose film. Without Tom’s initial push, though, we would hardly have come up with the present arrangement, by which I write an extended weekly piece, usually on one film.
The space I am given allows me to broaden my argument—or forces me, in an uninteresting week, to make something out of nothing. But what is my role in the public arena I assume that people choose what films to go to on the basis of the stars, the publicity or the director. There is also such a thing as loyalty to "type" or its opposite. It can only rarely happen that someone who hates westerns buys a ticket for one after reading a review, or a love story addict avoids a romantic film because of what the papers say.
So if a film review isn’t really a consumer guide, what is it I certainly don’t feel I have a responsibility to be "right" about a movie. Nor do I think there should be a certain number of "great" and "bad" films each year. All I have to do is put forward an argument. I’m not a judge, and nor would I want to be.

What do we learn about Tom Seaton in the first paragraph ______

A. He has encouraged the author to become a writer.
B. He has worked for various areas of the media.
C. He met the author when working for television.
D. He preferred to employ people that he knows.