以下关于 Visual Basic 特点叙述中，错误的是______。A．Visua

慢性肺心病时肺动脉高压形成的最主要的因素是：

A、支气管平滑肌痉挛

B、支气管感染

C、缺氧性肺小动脉痉挛

D、肺毛细血管数量减少

E、肺静脉压力增高

阅读下面的文字。

癖好

（美国）弗雷德里克·布朗

“我听到谣传，”桑斯特罗姆说道，“大意是说，你——”他转头看看四周，要绝对弄清，确实就只他和药剂师单独在这间小药房里。药剂师是个侏儒般的小个子男人，皱纹满面，可能在五十到一百岁间的任何一个年龄。就只他们在这里，但桑斯特罗姆照样压低了声音。“——大意是说，你有一种人全然识不破的毒药。”

药剂师点点头。他转过柜台，锁上前面的店门，而后朝柜台后面的一个门道走去。“我要歇会儿喝点咖啡，”他说，“请跟我一起来喝一杯。”

桑斯特罗姆跟着他转过柜台，穿过门道，进了一间四周从顶到底放满瓶架的后室。药剂师插上电咖啡壶的插头，找了两只杯子放在一张桌上，桌两边各放了一张椅子。他示意桑斯特罗姆在一张椅子上坐下，自己坐了另一张。“告诉我吧，”他说，“你想毒死谁，又是为什么？”

“这个要紧吗？”桑斯特罗姆问。“那还不成吗，我付钱——”

药剂师举起一只手打断了他。“是的，那很要紧。得让我相信，你值得我给你那东西。要不然——”他耸了耸肩。

“好吧，”桑斯特罗姆说。“那人嘛，是我的妻子。原因嘛——”他长篇大论地说起来。他话没讲完，咖啡煮好了。药剂师稍稍打断他一会，为他俩倒了咖啡。最后，桑斯特罗姆结束了他的讲述。

小个子药剂师点点头。“不错，我偶尔配一种人识不破的毒药。我干这个免费；只要我认为事情值得，我不收钱。我帮助过许多杀人犯。”

“太好了，”桑斯特罗姆说。“那就请你给我那东西吧。”

药剂师朝他微笑。“我已给过你了。在做好咖啡时，我已认定你值得给。我说过，它免费。但解毒药可有价。”

桑斯特罗姆脸色变白了。但他事先预料到——不是这个，而是被出卖的可能，或某种形式的勒索。他从口袋里掏出手枪。

药剂师咯咯笑起来。“你不敢用那个。你能在那几千个瓶子当中——”他朝那些架子挥挥手，“找到那解毒药吗？还是你愿意找到一种作用更快、毒性更大的毒药？或者，如果你认为我在骗你，你其实并没真的中毒，那你就来吧，开枪吧。三小时以内，毒药开始起性，你就会知道答案。”

“解毒药什么价？”桑斯特罗姆咆哮着说。

“十分公道，一千块。毕竟，人必须生活；即使他的癖好是阻止谋杀，也没理由说不该拿这赚钱呀。是吧？”

桑斯特罗姆咆哮着，放下了手枪，但放在伸手够得着的地方，掏出钱包来。或许，他服过解毒药后，仍然要使用那手枪。他把一百元的票子数了一千元，把它们放在桌上。

药剂师没有立即伸手去拿它们。他说：“还有一件事——为了你妻子的安全和我的安全。你得写一份有关你的意图——你原先的意图的自白书。我相信你原先的意图是谋杀你的妻子。而后你要等我出去，把它寄给我一个朋友，告知他谋杀的详情。他要把它留作证据，以防你什么时候还是决定要杀死你的妻子。或者杀死我，为了那事。

“当那寄出后，回这儿来给你解毒药，我就安全了。我给你拿纸和笔。哟，还有件事——虽然我并不绝对一定要那么办。请你帮助散布我有一种人识不破的毒药的消息，好吗？任何人决不会知道的，桑斯特罗姆先生。要是你有什么敌人的话，你挽救的性命，可能正是你自己的性命哩。”

（载1990年1期韩长清译）

小题1:结合全文内容，下列表述正确的一项是（　）（３分）

A．药剂师直言不讳，自己确实有一种别人识不破的毒药，而且免费帮助许多人杀过人。

B．药剂师的癖好是阻止谋杀还是帮助谋杀不好断定，但他认为有理由赚这钱是可以断定的。

C．药剂师认为桑斯特罗姆值得自己免费给他毒药，结果证明也确实值得。

D．药剂师从开始煮咖啡下药到最后让桑斯特罗姆写下意图自白书，都处理得周密严谨，充分表明他是一个攻于心计的人。小题2:在药店里，桑斯特罗姆经历了怎样的心理变化过程？（４分）

答： __________________________________________________________

小题3:用自己的话概括文章第一段中描写的药剂师具有怎样的外部形象特征，并说说这样写对塑造药剂师整个人物形象的意义。（６分）

答： __________________________________________________________

小题4:联系小说情节和现实生活实际，说说你对“你挽救的性命，可能正是你自己的性命”这句话的理解。（８分）

答： __________________________________________________________

《左传》的风格特色是（）.

A.佶屈聱牙

B.情韵并美

C.辩丽恣肆

D.质朴平实

下列有关教育起源的诸学说中，产生于马克思历史唯物主义指导下的是( )

A．神话起源说
B．劳动起源说
C．心理起源说
D．生物起源说

European farm ministers have ended three weeks of negotiations with a deal which they claim represents genuine reform of the common agricultural policy (CAP). Will it be enough to kick off the Doha world trade negotiations

On the face of it, the deal agreed in the early hours of Thursday June 26th looks promising. Most subsidies linked to specific farm products are, at last, to be broken--the idea is to replace these with a direct payment to farmers, .unconnected to particular products. Support prices for several key products, including milk and butter, are to be cut-that should mean European prices eventually falling towards the world market level. Cut-ting the link between subsidy and production was the main objective of proposals put forward by Mr. Fischler, which had formed the starting point for the negotiations.

The CAP is hugely unpopular around the world. It subsidizes European farmers to such an extent that they can undercut farmers from poor countries, who also face trade barriers that largely exclude them from the potentially lucrative European market. Farm trade is also a key feature of the Doha round of trade talks, launched under the auspices of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in November 2001. Developing countries have lined up alongside a number of industrial countries to demand an end to the massive subsidies Europe pays its farmers. Several Doha deadlines have already been missed because of the EU’s intransigence, and the survival of the talks will be at risk if no progress is made by September, when the world’s trade ministers meet in Cancun, Mexico.

But now even the French seem to have gone along with the deal hammered out in Luxembourg. Up to a point, anyway. The package of measures gives the green light for the most eager reformers to move fast to implement the changes within their own countries. But there is an escape clause of sorts for the French and other reform-averse nations. They can delay implementation for up to two years. There is also a suggestion that the reforms might not apply where there is a chance that they would lead to a reduction in land under cultivation.

These 1et-outs are potentially damaging for Europe’s negotiators in the Doha round. They could significantly reduce the cost savings that the reforms might otherwise generate and, in turn, keep European expenditure on farm support unacceptably high by world standards. Mote generally, the escape clauses could undermine the reforms by encouraging the suspicion that the new package will not deliver the changes that its supporters claim Close analysis of what is inevitably a very complicated package might confirm the sceptics’ fears.

It can be inferred from the third paragraph that（）

A. farmers from poor countries were put at a disadvantage by CAP

B. the deal will be a key subject of debate in Doha round of trade talks

C. the deal was probably a result of pressure from other countries

D. the world’s trade ministers will resist the new deal reached recently