医疗机构工作人员上岗工作，必须佩带标牌。标牌除载明本人姓名外，还应载明（） A.性别

阅读《别忘了赶路》一文，回答问题。

　　人活于世，总有些烦恼来敲你的心窗，总有些坑坑洼洼停在你必经的路上。如此，我们是否在烦恼到来之前就摇头叹息，是否因道路崎岖就止步不前。

　　一日上街，见一匆匆赶路的小男孩，可能是因为他走得太急，竟没有注意到前面有一块石头，待他行至石头前，猛地被绊倒。这一跤摔得很重，他足足在地上坐了两三分钟，眼窝里渐渐积满了泪水。尔后，他缓缓地从地上爬起来，揉了揉受了伤的腿，一边回头看他跌倒的地方，一边抹着泪继续向前走去。

　　我也曾立在窗前，看一簇一簇上班的人群，他们个个行色匆忙。忽见一骑自行车的姑娘，由于人多挤掉了她的饭盒，霎时，她精心准备的饭菜洒了一地。她弯下腰来，匆匆地拾起饭盒，苦笑一下又匆匆赶路了。我看罢不觉为之感慨，站在我身后的好友说：

　　“跌倒也罢，掉饭盒也罢，还是赶路要紧。”我的心猛然一震：人生不也如此么？

　　的确，人伴着自己的哭声而来，又伴着别人的哭声而走，这期间不就是一次短暂而漫长的旅行吗？而我们所拥有的和失去的不正是极平常极自然的过程吗？无论我们遇到什么，有过什么，失去什么，都得向前走。

　　那个男孩虽然重重地跌了一跤，但他还是站起来，虽然他哭了，但仍没有忘记前行，因为他要去上学或者有别的事情要他去做。那个姑娘虽然掉了饭盒，但没有牢骚没有指责，因为在这道理的前方还有更灿烂的风景等待着她去玩味去阅读。他们的心中都有一个美好的目标，是这个美好的目标鼓励他们不忘却前行。

　　是啊，人生如斯，哭也好，笑也好，只是别忘了赶路。

1．结合上下文，体会下面加粗词语在句子中的含义

这道路的前方还有更灿烂的风景等待这她去玩味去阅读。

玩味：_____________________________________。

阅读：_____________________________________。

2．文章的开头说：“总有些坑坑洼洼停在你必经的路上”，具体到文中的两个人物身上。小男孩的“坑坑洼洼”是指_______________，姑娘的“坑坑洼洼”是指_______________，实际上都是比喻_______________。

3．怎样理解文中最后一段话的深刻含义？

_______________________________________________

4．在你周围的生活中，“记得赶路”的人固然很多，但“忘了赶路”的人也一定存在。请分别选择一个举例说说。

_______________________________________________

分子中含有全反式多烯结构的是( )

A．维生素B₁
B．维生素B₂
C．维生素B₆
D．维生素A
E．维生素D₃

企业对于已计入“待处理财产损溢”科目的存货盘亏及毁损事项进行会计处理时，应计入管理费用的是( )。

A．管理不善造成的存货净损失
B．自然灾害造成的存货净损失
C．应由保险公司赔偿的存货损失
D．应由过失人赔偿的存货损失

下列情况中，应当将相关账户或交易的控制风险评估为低水平的是( )。

A．相关内部控制失效

B．难以评价相关内部控制的有效性

C．相关内部控制有效

D．相关内部控制不健全

When it comes to suing doctors, Philadelphia is hardly the city of brotherly love. A combination of sprightly lawyers and sympathetic juries has made Philadelphia a hotspot for medical-malpractice lawsuits. Since 1995, Pennsylvania state courts have awarded an average of $ 2m in such cases, according to Jury Verdict Research, a survey firm. Some medical specialists have seen their malpractice insurance premiums nearly double over the past year. Obstetricians are now paying up to $104,000 a year to protect themselves.

The insurance industry is largely to blame. Carol Golin, the Monitor’s editor, argues that in the 1990s insurers tried to grab market share by offering artificially low rates (betting that any losses would be covered by gains on their investments). The stock-market correction, coupled with the large legal awards, has eroded the insurers’ reserves. Three in Pennsylvania alone have gone bust.

A few doctors--particularly older ones--will quit. The rest are adapting. Some are abandoning litigation-prone procedures, such as delivering babies. Others are moving parts of their practice to neighboring states where insurance rates are lower. Some from Pennsylvania have opened offices in New Jersey. New doctors may also be deterred from setting up shop in litigation havens, however prestigious.

Despite a Republican president, tort reform has got nowhere at the federal level. Indeed doctors could get clobbered indirectly by a Patients’ Bill of Rights, which would further expose managed care companies to lawsuits. This prospect has fuelled interest among doctors in Pennsylvania’s new medical malpractice reform bill, which was signed into law on March 20th. It will, among other things, give doctors $ 40m of state funds to offset their insurance premiums, spread the payment of awards out over time and prohibit individuals from double dipping--that is, suing a doctor for damages that have already been paid by their health insurer.

But will it really help Randall Bovbjerg, a health policy expert at the Urban Institute, argues that the only proper way to slow down the litigation machine would be to limit the compensation for pain and suffering, so-called "non-monetary damages". Needless to say, a fixed cap on such awards is resisted by most trial lawyers. But Mr Bovbjerg reckons a more nuanced approach, with a sliding scale of payments based on well-defined measures of injury, is a better way forward. In the meantime, doctors and insurers are bracing themselves for a couple more rough years before the insurance cycle turns.

Nobody disputes that hospital staff make mistakes: a 1999 Institute of Medicine report claimed that errors kill at least 44,000 patients a year. But there is little evidence that malpractice lawsuits on their own will solve the problem.

By mentioning "double-dipping" (Paragraph 4), the author is talking about（）

A.compensations

B. premiums

C.stock shares

D. investment