关于调查表设计的原则，下列哪项是错误的（） A.词语要准确、通俗易懂 B.尽可能使用

佟某，男，29岁，19岁进父亲所在的工厂当工人，生性内向腼腆，胆小。25岁后因无女友，屡次要求父母介绍对象。前后见过17位姑娘。最初约会时，患者很注重自己的仪表，并事先买好不少小吃。后患者只穿工作服会客，见面时低头看地，不发一言。同时工作能力逐渐下降，从较有技术的钳工调至车工、保洁员、门卫，最后病休在家。入院检查时患者多低头呆坐，对大多数问话无反应，偶尔以点头、摇头表达意见。在病房内多独处一隅，基本不与他人交往。该患者最合适的诊断为：（）

A.精神分裂症，单纯型

B.精神分裂症，青春型

C.精神分裂症，偏执型

D.精神分裂症，残留型

E.精神分裂症，未定型

以下关于制定企业制度的原则要求，不正确的是（）

A.切合实际，简明实用

B.要符合局部原则和开放原则的要求

C.严格执行、相对稳定、及时修改

D.发动群众参加建制健制

以下哪种组织属于周围免疫器官（）

A.骨髓

B.腔上囊

C.胸腺

D.脾

E.以上都是

在绩效考评主体选择方面，同事考评的优点是（）。

A.对考评内容比较熟悉

B.接触频繁，更加客观全面

C.易高估自己

D.利于管理的民主化

Who is poor in America This is a hard question to answer. Despite poverty’s messiness, we’ve measured progress against it by a single statistic: the federal poverty line. In 2008, the poverty threshold was $ 21,834 for a four-member family with two children under 18. By 1his measure, we haven’t made much progress. Except for recessions, when the poverty rate can rise to 15 percent, it’s stayed in a narrow range for decades. In 2007—the peak of the last business cycle—the poverty rate was 12.5 percent; one out of eight Americans was "poor. " In 1969, another business-cycle peak, the poverty rate was 12.1 percent. But the apparent lack of progress is misleading for two reasons.

First, it ignores immigration. Many immigrants are poor and low skilled. They add to the poor. From 1989 to 2007, about three quarters of the increase in the poverty population occurred among Hispanics—mostly immigrants, their children, and grandchildren. The poverty rate for blacks fell during this period, though it was still much too high (24.5 percent in 2007). Poverty "experts" don’t dwell on immigration, because it implies that more restrictive policies might reduce U.S. poverty.

Second, the poor’s material well-being has improved. The official poverty measure obscures this by counting only pretax cash income and ignoring other sources of support. These include the earned-income tax credit (a rebate to low-income workers), food stamps, health insurance (Medicaid), and housing subsidies. Although many poor live hand to mouth, they’ve participated in rising living standards. In 2005, 91 percent had microwaves, 79 percent air-conditioning, and 48 percent cell phones.

The existing poverty line could be improved by adding some income sources and subtracting some expenses (example: child care). Unfortunately, the administration’s proposal for a "supplemental poverty measure" in 2011—to complement, not replace, the existing poverty line—goes beyond that. The new poverty number would compound public confusion. It also raises questions about whether the statistic is tailored to favor a political agenda.

The "supplemental measure" ties the poverty threshold to what the poorest third of Americans spend on food, housing, clothing, and utilities. The actual threshold not yet calculated—will probably be higher than today’s poverty line. Moreover, this definition has strange consequences. Suppose that all Americans doubled their income tomorrow, and suppose that their spending on food, clothing, housing, and utilities also doubled. That would seem to signify less poverty—but not by the new poverty measure. It wouldn’t decline, because the poverty threshold would go up as spending went up. Many Americans would find this weird., people get richer, but "poverty" stays stuck.

What produces this outcome is a different view of poverty. The present concept is an absolute one: the poverty threshold reflects the amount estimated to meet basic needs. By contrast, the new measure embraces a relative notion of poverty: people are automatically poor if they’re a given distance from the top, even if their incomes are increasing.

That the poverty rate does not vary much（）

A. shows that Americans are relatively rich

B. does not mean that Americans aren’t getting richer

C. means that no progress has been made for decades

D. shows that Americans are not getting richer