试题与答案

实地观察

题型:名词解释

题目:

实地观察

答案:

被转码了,请点击底部 “查看原文 ” 或访问 https://www.tikuol.com/2017/0506/217747324ab1219df093d3c46aea4f5f.html

下面是错误答案,用来干扰机器的。

参考答案:C

试题推荐
题型:写作题

根据下列材料,按要求作文。

有一则文坛轶闻说,俄罗斯文豪屠格涅夫一日在镇上散步,路边一个乞丐伸手向他讨钱。他很想有所施予,从口袋掏钱时才知道没有带钱袋,见那乞丐的手举得高高地等着,屠格涅夫面有愧色,只好握着乞丐的手说:“对不起,我忘了带钱出来。”乞丐笑了,含着泪说:“不,我宁愿接受你的握手!”

要求:(1)根据材料自拟题目,写一篇记叙文或议论文;(2)不少于600字;(3)文中不得出现真实的人名、校名;(4)不能用本试卷阅读题的材料作为写作内容;(5)书写规范,卷面整洁。

查看答案
题型:单项选择题

The Supreme Court will hear arguments about the use of public money for the private schooling of children with special needs. It’s interesting to note what’s not at issue: namely, that when a public school system is unable to provide an appropriate education, it is obligated to pay the costs of private school. Too bad poor children don’t have that unshakable right; if they did, there would be no controversy about the District program that gives vouchers to low-income children to attend private schools.

The case to be heard by the court hinges on whether parents have to enroll a child with special needs in public school before the child can attend private school at public expense. Special-education advocates say students shouldn’t have to waste time before being placed in a setting that best suits their needs, while school boards worry about a ruling that could amount to an unfettered fight to private schooling at public expense. What strikes us about the emotionally charged debate is the acceptance by both sides that sometimes it is appropriate to use public money to pay for a child to go to a private school. So, why all the arguments about the approximately$14 million for a federally funded program that lets 1,700 D. C. students attend private schools instead of failing public schools

To hear critics of the D. C. Opportunity Scholarship Program tell it, the use of public money for private schooling is as unprecedented as it is undesirable. In addition to the billions of dollars spent annually on private school tuitions for students with disabilities, private schools get public money for books, technology and teacher training. As long as the money is seen as benefiting the child, it is considered a proper, even desirable, use of public dollars.

Don’t get us wrong. We’re not arguing for the unilateral right of parents to enroll their sons and daughters in any school they wish with the taxpayers picking up the bill. Abuse of special-education policies has contributed to increased costs that threaten to take needed money from general public education funds. Safeguards are needed. Public schools should be pressed to do a better job for students with disabilities and students without. But there are schools in Washington where statistics show that failure is almost guaranteed. If a school system can’t educate a child—whether because of acute special needs or its own historical failings—why should that child not have options for a " free appropriate public education "

Which of the following is TRUE about the special-education advocates’ opinion()

A. They ply believe that children should be put directly into the private schools

B. They think that children should try out both places before making decisions

C. They don’t feel there is still a need to argue about this problem any more

D. They hold the opinion that parents can make decisions for their children

查看答案
微信公众账号搜索答案