处方中含有刺激性药物及毒剧药时，可制成下列哪些制剂以防止过强刺激或中毒( ) A．

下列句中画线成语运用正确的一项是[ ]

A．古人给我们留下了许多荡气回肠的爱国故事，我们要重蹈覆辙，将古人的爱国精神发扬光大。

B．山区的孩子们想读书却没有校舍，没有书本，他们与我们现在拥有的读书条件真是无与伦比啊！

C．张老师批改作文非常认真，他常常吹毛求疵地指出我作文中的错别字。

D．读书的方法，不要固执一点，咬文嚼字，而要前后贯通，了解大意。

蛋鸡从出壳到淘汰，共分三个阶段进行饲养，即（）、（）、产蛋期。

按照《江苏省水利工程管理条例》，利用堤坝做路的，路面（含路面两侧各五十厘米的路肩）由（）负责管理、维修和养护。

A.水利部门

B.交通部门

C.所在地乡镇政府

D.水利和交通部门共同

Wherever people have been, they have left waste behind, which can cause all sorts of problems. Waste often stinks, attracts vermin and creates eyesores. More seriously, it can release harmful chemicals into the soil and water when dumped, or into the air when burned. And then there are some really nasty forms of industrial waste, such as spent nuclear fuel, for which no universally accepted disposal methods’ have thus far been developed.

Yet many also see waste as an opportunity. Getting rid of it all has become a huge global business. Rich countries spend some $120 billion a year disposing of their municipal waste alone and another $150 billion on industrial waste. The amount of waste that countries produce tends to grow in tandem with their economies, and especially with the rate of urbanization. So waste firms see a rich future in places such as China, India and Brazil, which at present spend only about $5 billion a year collecting and treating their municipal waste.

Waste also presents an opportunity in a grander sense: as a potential resource. Much of it is already burned to generate energy. Clever new technologies to turn it into fertiliser or chemicals or fuel are being developed all the time. Visionaries see a world without waste, with rubbish being routinely recycled.

Until last summer such views were spreading quickly. But since then plummeting prices for virgin paper, plastic and fuels, and hence also for the waste that substitutes for them, have put an end to such visions. Many of the recycling firms that had argued rubbish was on the way out now say that unless they are given financial help, they themselves will disappear.

Subsidies are a bad idea. Governments have a role to play in the business of waste management, but it is a regulatory and supervisory one. They should oblige people who create waste to clean up after themselves and ideally ensure that the price of any product reflects the cost of disposing of it safely. That would help to signal which items are hardest to get rid of, giving consumers an incentive to buy goods that create less waste in the first place.

That may sound simple enough, but governments seldom get the rules right. In poorer countries they often have no rules at all, or if they have them they fail to enforce them. In rich countries they are often inconsistent: too strict about some sorts of waste and worryingly lax about others. They are also prone to imposing arbitrary targets and taxes. California, for example, wants to recycle all its trash not because it necessarily makes environmental or economic sense but because the goal of “zero waste” sounds politically attractive.

Which of the following is true according to the last paragraph（）

A. Rich countries might help poor countries to treat the waste

B. California’s “zero waste” program makes no environmental sense

C. More taxes are needed to collect and treat the waste efficiently

D. Governments’ policies on waste industry are largely incoherent