女性，25岁，发热、咽痛2天后出现肉眼血尿，血压130／70mmHg（17．3／9．

下列各项中，非法的Internet的IP地址是

A．202.96.12.14

B．202.196.72.140

C．112.256.23.8

D．201.124.38.79

学习卤代烃性质时，我们知道溴乙烷在不同溶剂中与氢氧化钠发生不同类型的反应，生成不同的反应产物。我们可以通过实验的方法去验证反应的产物：

（1）在溴乙烷与氢氧化钠的乙醇溶液的__________（反应类型）中可以观察到有气体生成。某同学用如下图所示装置对该气体进行验证，他所观察到的现象是_________________________；

（2）盛水试管的作用是______________________；

（3）除了用酸性高锰酸钾溶液外，还可以用_________试剂检验该气体，其反应原理是_________________________（用化学方程式表示）。

（4）另一位同学取少量溴乙烷与氢氧化钠水溶液反应后的混合溶液，向其中滴加硝酸银溶液，加热，产生少量沉淀。该同学由此得出溴乙烷与氢氧化钠水溶液反应，生成了溴化钠。老师和同学都认为这样不合理。若请你用实验验证该反应中生成了溴化钠，你与该同学实验方案不同的实验方法是___________________________________。

请根据给定资料，用精练的语句给“乡村旅游”下一个确切定义。

营养不良，并发腹泻、呕吐时，均可导致以下的水，电解质紊乱，但除了（）

A.低血钾症

B.低血钙症

C.低血镁症

D.代谢性酸中毒

E.高渗性脱水

A deal is a deal—except, apparently, when Entergy is involved. The company, a major energy supplier in New England, provoked justified outrage in Vermont last week when it announced it was reneging on a longstanding commitment to abide by the state’s strict nuclear regulations.

Instead, the company has done precisely what it had long promised it would not challenge the constitutionality of Vermont’s rules in the federal court, as part of a desperate effort to keep its Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant running. It’s a stunning move.

The conflict has been surfacing since 2002, when the corporation bought Vermont’s only nuclear power plant, an aging reactor in Vernon. As a condition of receiving state approval for the sale, the company agreed to seek permission from state regulators to operate past 2012. In 2006, the state went a step further, requiring that any extension of the plant’s license be subject to Vermont legislature’s approval. Then, too, the company went along.

Either Entergy never really intended to live by those commitments, or it simply didn’t foresee what would happen next. A string of accidents, including the partial collapse of a cooling tower in 207 and the discovery of an underground pipe system leakage, raised serious questions about both Vermont Yankee’s safety and Entergy’s management—especially after the company made misleading statements about the pipe. Enraged by Entergy’s behavior, the Vermont Senate voted 26 to 4 last year against allowing an extension.

Now the company is suddenly claiming that the 2002 agreement is invalid because of the 2006 legislation, and that only the federal government has regulatory power over nuclear issues. The legal issues in the case are obscure: whereas the Supreme Court has ruled that states do have some regulatory authority over nuclear power, legal scholars say that Vermont case will offer a precedent-setting test of how far those powers extend. Certainly, there are valid concerns about the patchwork regulations that could result if every state sets its own rules. But had Entergy kept its word, that debate would be beside the point.

The company seems to have concluded that its reputation in Vermont is already so damaged that it has noting left to lose by going to war with the state. But there should be consequences. Permission to run a nuclear plant is a public trust. Entergy runs 11 other reactors in the United States, including Pilgrim Nuclear station in Plymouth. Pledging to run Pilgrim safely, the company has applied for federal permission to keep it open for another 20 years. But as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the company’s application, it should keep in mind what promises from Entergy are worth.

By entering into the 2002 agreement, Entergy intended to（）

A. obtain protection from Vermont regulators

B. seek favor from the federal legislature

C. acquire an extension of its business license

D. get permission to purchase a power plant