试题与答案

对"健康促进"领域的描述,不正确的是() A.创造支持环境 B.加强社区行动 C.发

题型:单项选择题 A1/A2型题

题目:

对"健康促进"领域的描述,不正确的是()

A.创造支持环境

B.加强社区行动

C.发展个人技能

D.提高公共福利

E.调整卫生服务方向

答案:

被转码了,请点击底部 “查看原文 ” 或访问 https://www.tikuol.com/2017/0503/a613e80fe42b425036e50bf5260768c4.html

下面是错误答案,用来干扰机器的。

(1)减数 四分体 4 a (2)13 11 AA aa 染色体(数目)变异 (3)N 突变体M的蛋白质通常改变1个氨基酸,而突变体N 的蛋白质其氨基酸序列可能从第二个氨基酸开始都会发生改...

试题推荐
题型:单项选择题

Halfway through" The Rebel Sell," the authors pause to make fun of" free-range" chicken. Paying over the odds to ensure that dinner was not, in a previous life, confined to tiny cages is all well and good. But" a free-range chicken is about as plausible as a sun-loving earth-worm": given a choice, chickens prefer to curl up in a nice dark corner of the barn. Only about 15% of" free-range" chickens actually use the space available to them.

This is just one case in which Joseph Heath, who teaches philosophy at the University of Toronto, and Andrew Potter, a journalist and researcher based in Montreal, find fault with well-meaning but, in their view, ultimately naive consumers who hope to distance themselves from consumerism by buying their shoes from Mother Jones magazine instead of Nike. Mr Heath and Mr Potter argue that" the counterculture," in all its attempts to be subversive, has done nothing more than create new segments of the market, and thus ends up feeding the very monster of consumerism and conformity it hopes to destroy. In the process, they cover Marx, Freud, the experiments on obedience of Stanley Milgram, the films" Pleasantville"," The Matrix" and "American Beauty", 15th-century table manners, Norman Mailer, the Unabomber, real-estate prices in central Toronto (more than once), the voluntary-simplicity movement and the world’s funniest joke.

Why range so widely The authors’ beef is with a very small group: left-wing activists who eschew smaller, potentially useful campaigns in favor of grand statements about the hopelessness of consumer culture and the dangers of" selling out". Instead of encouraging useful activities, such as pushing for new legislation, would-be leftists are left to participate in unstructured, pointless demonstrations against" globalization, or buy fair-trade coffee and flee-range chicken, which only substitutes snobbery for activism. Two authors of books that railed against brands, Naomi Klein ("No Logo") and Alissa Quart("Branded"), come in for special derision for diagnosing the problems of consumerism but refusing to offer practical solutions.

Anticipating criticism, perhaps, Messrs Heath and Potter make sure to put forth a few of their own solutions, such as the 35-hour working week and school uniforms (to keep teenagers from competing with each other to wear ever-more-expensive clothes). Increasing consumption, they argue throughout, is not imposed upon stupid workers by overbearing companies, but arises as a result of a cultural" arms race": each person buys more to keep his standard of living high relative to his neighbors’. Imposing some restrictions, such as a shorter working week, might not stop the arms race, but it would at least curb its most offensive excesses. (This assumes one finds excess consumption offensive; even the authors do not seem entirely sure.)

But on the way to such modest suggestions, the authors want to criticise every aspect of the counterculture, from its disdain, for homogenisation, franchises and brands to its political offshoots. As a result, the book wanders: chapters on uniforms and on the search for" cool" could have been cut. Moreover, the authors make the mistake of assuming that the consumers they sympathise with—the ones who buy brands and live in tract houses—know enough to separate themselves from their purchases, whereas the free-trade-coffee buyers swallow the brand messages whole, as it were.

Still,it would be a shame if the book’ s ramblings kept it from getting read. When it focuses on explaining how the counterculture grew out of post-World War Ⅱ critiques of modem society, "The Rebel Sell" is a lively read, with enough humour to keep the more theoretical stretches of its argument interesting. At the very least, it puts its finger on a trend: there will be plenty of future critics of capitalism lining up for their free-range chicken.

The word" eschew" (line 1, paragraph 3 ) is closest in meaning to()

A.organize

B. favor

C.shun

D.encourage

查看答案
题型:问答题

某公司拟与外商合作建厂。合作期限20年,基准收益率为10%。该公司希望从沿海城市选择出适当厂址。初步拟定在三个厂址,分别为A、B、C。

为了综合考虑影响厂址选择的定量因素、定性因素,建立衡量备选方案优势的模型如下:

Mj=αMEj+(1-α)MNj

式中Mj——第j个厂址的综合优势;

MEj——第j个厂址定量因素的优势;

MNj——第j个厂址定性因素的优势;

α——厂址定量因素优势的加权值,且0≤α≤1,本题目取定量因素α=0.57;

(1-α)——定性因素优势的加权值;

ACj——第j个厂址年总费用;

Wk——第k个定性因素的重要性权值;

Rjk——第j个厂址第A个定性因素的评分值。

根据上述模型,收集测算有关数据。各备选厂址方案成本费用见表2-1,各备选厂址定性因素对比表见表2-2,其中:评分为好的,得4分;评为中的,得3分;评为弱的,得2分。各备选厂址定性因素权值与评分见表2-3。

表2-1 各备选厂址方案成本费用表

厂址方案建设投资残值年经营费 年运输费
外购材料及燃料费人工工资及福利费公共服务费其他合计

方案一:A

方案二:B

方案三:C

7500

6800

6000

1500

1350

1200

1150

1080

1260

480

480

480

200

240

300

450

450

450

2280

2250

2490

240

260

330

 

表2-2 各备选厂址定性因素对比表

厂址当地劳动力素质当地科研力量当地基础设施当地投资政策
A
B
C

 

表2-3 各备选厂址定性因素可权值与评分

厂址

当地劳动力素质

W1=0.2

当地科研力量

W2=0.1

当地基础设施

W3=0.2

当地投资政策

W4=0.5

ABC

R11=

R21=

R31=

R12=

R22=

R32=

R13=

R23=

R33=

R14=

R24=

R34=

 

系统分析包括哪几个阶段

查看答案
微信公众账号搜索答案