若方程x2-6x+m=0有两个同号不相等的实数根，则m的取值范围是（ ） A．m

下列各项，不属于虚证和实证鉴别要点的是（）

A.汗出的有无

B.病程的新久

C.语声的高低

D.脉象的虚实

E.舌象的老嫩

《论语》十则中“士不可以不弘毅”的原因是_____________________________。

男性，45岁，主因头痛、恶心、呕吐3天，发热2天入院。既往体健。查体：体温38．5℃、呼吸20次／分、脉搏102次/分、血压13~80mmHg，神志清楚，言语流利，右侧瞳孔：左侧瞳孔=4mm：2mm，右侧瞳孔光反射消失，右侧眼球活动受限，颈部抵抗，颈胸4横指，布氏征阳性。两肺呼吸音清，未闻及干湿性口啰音。

提问：对此患者下述哪项叙述正确（）

A.可行DSA检查

B.可行TCD检查

C.入院时腰穿脑脊液肉眼呈均匀一致血性

D.入院时腰穿脑脊液肉眼呈淡黄色

E.入院时腰穿脑脊液肉眼开始呈红色，颜色逐渐变淡，后为无色

F.可行MRA检查

2001年6月25日，新华造船厂确认该项工程收入的会计分录是( )。

A．借：工程结算 1551200
预计损失准备 40000
贷：主营业务收入 1360000
应交税金——应交增值税(销项税额) 231200

B．借：主营业务成本 1110000
预计损失准备 40000
工程施工——毛利 210000
工程结算 231200
贷：主营业务收入 1360000
应交税金——应交增值税(销项税额) 231200

C．借：应收账款 1521000
贷：主营业务收入1300000
应交税金——应交增值税(销项税额) 221000

D．借：银行存款 1638000
贷：主营业务收入1400000
应交税金——应交增值税(销项税额) 238000

When it comes to suing doctors, Philadelphia is hardly the city of brotherly love. A combination of sprightly lawyers and sympathetic juries has made Philadelphia a hotspot for medical-malpractice lawsuits. Since 1995, Pennsylvania state courts have awarded an average of $ 2m in such cases, according to Jury Verdict Research, a survey firm. Some medical specialists have seen their malpractice insurance premiums nearly double over the past year. Obstetricians are now paying up to $104,000 a year to protect themselves.

The insurance industry is largely to blame. Carol Golin, the Monitor’s editor, argues that in the 1990s insurers tried to grab market share by offering artificially low rates (betting that any losses would be covered by gains on their investments). The stock-market correction, coupled with the large legal awards, has eroded the insurers’ reserves. Three in Pennsylvania alone have gone bust.

A few doctors--particularly older ones--will quit. The rest are adapting. Some are abandoning litigation-prone procedures, such as delivering babies. Others are moving parts of their practice to neighboring states where insurance rates are lower. Some from Pennsylvania have opened offices in New Jersey. New doctors may also be deterred from setting up shop in litigation havens, however prestigious.

Despite a Republican president, tort reform has got nowhere at the federal level. Indeed doctors could get clobbered indirectly by a Patients’ Bill of Rights, which would further expose managed care companies to lawsuits. This prospect has fuelled interest among doctors in Pennsylvania’s new medical malpractice reform bill, which was signed into law on March 20th. It will, among other things, give doctors $ 40m of state funds to offset their insurance premiums, spread the payment of awards out over time and prohibit individuals from double dipping--that is, suing a doctor for damages that have already been paid by their health insurer.

But will it really help Randall Bovbjerg, a health policy expert at the Urban Institute, argues that the only proper way to slow down the litigation machine would be to limit the compensation for pain and suffering, so-called "non-monetary damages". Needless to say, a fixed cap on such awards is resisted by most trial lawyers. But Mr Bovbjerg reckons a more nuanced approach, with a sliding scale of payments based on well-defined measures of injury, is a better way forward. In the meantime, doctors and insurers are bracing themselves for a couple more rough years before the insurance cycle turns.

Nobody disputes that hospital staff make mistakes: a 1999 Institute of Medicine report claimed that errors kill at least 44,000 patients a year. But there is little evidence that malpractice lawsuits on their own will solve the problem.

It seems that the author is most critical of（）

A. negligent doctors

B. unfriendly patients

C. insurance companies

D. sympathetic lawyers