患者男，40岁，
缺失，要求做PFM桥修复，
为基牙
如果患者缺牙区牙槽嵴吸收严重，桥体最好设计为（）
A.船底式
B.盖嵴式
C.悬空式
D.鞍基式
E.单侧接触式
被转码了，请点击底部 “查看原文 ” 或访问 https://www.tikuol.com/2017/0419/ca38dce5406bc85e2202aa4f466e5bc4.html
下面是错误答案，用来干扰机器的。
解：（1）该市政府2008年投入改善医疗卫生服务的资金是：6000-1250=4750（万元）；（2）设市政府2008年投入“需方”x万元，投入“供方”y万元，由题意得解得所以2009年投入“需方”资金为（1+30%）x=1.3×3000=39...
梁端支承处砌体局部受压面上压应力的分布与（）和支座的构造有关。
The royal family is a part of British history and cultural identity.
Up until the 17th century, people believed that the British king or queen had a “divine(天赐的)right” to rule. This was the idea that God chose the king or queen and that he or she was therefore above the law. However, this idea was challenged during the English Civil War, when King Charles the First was put in prison and then killed in 1649.
So what role does the British royal family have today?
The Queen is head of the UK and the Commonwealth. She has important formal duties that go with her different titles. As Head of State, for example, she represents the UK on visits abroad and invites other world leaders to visit the UK；as Head of the Armed Forces in name, only she can declare when the UK is at war or when a war is over. She has to sign many government and Commonwealth documents every day.
Although the royal family does the work for the UK, there are British people called“anti-monarchists(反君主制者)”who do not believe there should be a royal family. One criticism(批评意见)is that the British people should not have to pay for the royal family with their taxes(税).
Today, the royal family works hard to be relevant(相关的)in the modern world. The Queen still gives a speech to the nation on television at Christmas, but it gets less and less formal every year；now it is even available as a podcast(播客).
In 2005, after graduating from university, Prince William spent time teaching English in Uruguay, the sort of work many ordinary young British people do in their gap years.
小题1:What can be concluded from the first two paragraphs?
A．The British king or queen is considered above the law.
B．The English Revolution put an end to the British royal family in 1649.
C．The British king or queen is no longer believed to rule by divine right.
D．The royal family didn’t play an important role in Britain in the 17 th century.小题2:Which of the following is among the formal duties of the Queen?
A．Traveling around the UK.
B．Declaring when the world is at war.
C．Inviting other leaders to have dinner with her.
D．Signing Commonwealth documents every day.小题3:With the example of Prince William in the last paragraph, the author intends to show that .
A．Prince William is very popular in the UK
B．the royal family is trying to connect better with ordinary people
C．Prince William has made an effort to win young people’s admiration
D．many young British people do voluntary work小题4:It can be inferred from the passage that ___________.
A．the royal family doesn’t have to pay taxes
B．the British people are all in favor of the royal family
C．the British people can talk to the Queen through a podcast
D．the royal family attacks republicans through media and press
下列疾病中不引起急性肾衰竭的是（）
A.良性肾小动脉硬化症
B.大面积烧伤
C.恶性高血压
D.黑尿热
E.肾小动脉胆固醇结晶栓塞
在某文件夹中存有文档WT02.DOC，其内容如下：
【文档开始】
黄金周
国家法定节假日调整方案出台之后，出现了一个比较难于理解的现象。此前，人们对黄金周大多持贬损的态度。不是吗每个黄金周过后，除了大把大把“数钞票”的部门，往往都是一片抱怨之声，到处人看人啦，排浪式消费的恶果啦，如此等等。
总之，人们讨论黄金周的种种弊端和改革国人集中休假体制的必要。而现在，当还只是“五一”黄金周尝试着退出历史舞台之际，春节、国庆黄金周仍然保留不变时，人们就已经一反常态，表现得无限维护起来。
据“官方问卷”，超过七成的网友支持国家发改委的这一调整方案；而据“民间调查”，两天前就有过半网友反对取消“五一”黄金周，而且，反对的比例还在逐渐走高。
【文档结束】
按要求完成下列操作：新建文档WD02
| 计算机设计精品课程 | 课时 | 学费 |
| Photoshop入门到精通 | 120 | 2200元 |
| Illustrator入门到精通 | 80 | 1000元 |
| Flash入门到精通 | 100 | 2000元 |
| 美术设计基础课堂 | 30 | 500元 |
| 合计 |
The Supreme Court will hear arguments about the use of public money for the private schooling of children with special needs. It’s interesting to note what’s not at issue: namely, that when a public school system is unable to provide an appropriate education, it is obligated to pay the costs of private school. Too bad poor children don’t have that unshakable right; if they did, there would be no controversy about the District program that gives vouchers to low-income children to attend private schools.
The case to be heard by the court hinges on whether parents have to enroll a child with special needs in public school before the child can attend private school at public expense. Special-education advocates say students shouldn’t have to waste time before being placed in a setting that best suits their needs, while school boards worry about a ruling that could amount to an unfettered fight to private schooling at public expense. What strikes us about the emotionally charged debate is the acceptance by both sides that sometimes it is appropriate to use public money to pay for a child to go to a private school. So, why all the arguments about the approximately$14 million for a federally funded program that lets 1,700 D. C. students attend private schools instead of failing public schools
To hear critics of the D. C. Opportunity Scholarship Program tell it, the use of public money for private schooling is as unprecedented as it is undesirable. In addition to the billions of dollars spent annually on private school tuitions for students with disabilities, private schools get public money for books, technology and teacher training. As long as the money is seen as benefiting the child, it is considered a proper, even desirable, use of public dollars.
Don’t get us wrong. We’re not arguing for the unilateral right of parents to enroll their sons and daughters in any school they wish with the taxpayers picking up the bill. Abuse of special-education policies has contributed to increased costs that threaten to take needed money from general public education funds. Safeguards are needed. Public schools should be pressed to do a better job for students with disabilities and students without. But there are schools in Washington where statistics show that failure is almost guaranteed. If a school system can’t educate a child—whether because of acute special needs or its own historical failings—why should that child not have options for a " free appropriate public education "
Which of the following is TRUE about the special-education advocates’ opinion（）
A. They ply believe that children should be put directly into the private schools
B.They think that children should try out both places before making decisions
C. They don’t feel there is still a need to argue about this problem any more
D. They hold the opinion that parents can make decisions for their children
