男性，75岁，患冠心病全心衰，治疗期间出现恶心、视力模糊、黄绿视，应及时向医生报告，

某企业按年利率8%向银行借款1000万元，银行要求维持贷款额20%的补偿性余额，该项借款的实际利率是：（）

A.6.4%

B.8%

C.9.6%

D.10%

On Apr. 27, the Dean of Duke’s business school had the unfortunate task of announcing that nearly 10% of the Class of 2008 had been caught cheating on a take-home final exam. The scandal, which has cast yet another pall over the leafy, Gothic campus, is already going down as the biggest episode of alleged student deception in the business school’s history.
Almost immediately, the questions started swirling. The accused MBAs were, on average, 29 years old. They were the cut-and-paste generation, the champions of Linux. Before going to the business school, they worked in corporations for an average of six years. They did so at a time when their bosses were trumpeting the brave new world of open source, where one’s ability to aggregate (or rip off) other people’s intellectual property was touted as a crucial competitive advantage.
It’s easy to imagine the explanations these MBAs, who are mulling an appeal, might come up with. Teaming up on a take-home exam: That’s not academic fraud, it’s postmodern learning, wiki style. Text-messaging exam answers or downloading essays onto iPods: That’s simply a wise use of technology. One can understand the confusion. This is a generation that came of age nabbing music off Napster and watching bootlegged Hollywood blockbusters in their dorm rooms. "What do you mean " you can almost hear them saying. "We’re not supposed to share "
That’s not to say that university administrators should ignore unethical behavior, if it in fact occurred. But in this wired world, maybe the very notion of what constitutes cheating has to be reevaluated. The scandal at Duke points to how much the world has changed, and how academia and corporations are confused about it all, sending split messages.
We’re told it’s all about teamwork and shared information. But then we’re graded and ranked as individuals. We assess everybody as single entities. But then we plop them into an interdependent world and tell them their success hinges on creative collaboration.
The new culture of shared information is vastly different from the old, where hoarding information was power. But professors-and bosses, for that matter-need to be able to test individual ability. For all the talk about workforce teamwork, there are plenty of times when a person is on his or her own, arguing a case, preparing a profit and loss statement, or writing a research report.
Still, many believe that a rethinking of the assessment process is in store. The Stanford University Design School, for example, is so collaborative that "it would be impossible to cheat," says D-school professor Robert I. Sutton. "If you found somebody to help you write an exam, in our view that’s a sign of an inventive person who gets stuff done. If you found someone to do work for free who was committed to open source, we’d say, ’Wow, that was smart. ’ One group of students got the police to help them with a school project to build a roundabout where there were a lot of bike accidents. Is that cheating "
That’s food for thought at a time when learning is becoming more and more of a social process embedded in a larger network. This is in no way a pass on those who consciously break the rules. With countries aping American business practices, a backlash against an ethically rudderless culture can’t happen soon enough. But the saga at Duke raises an interesting question. In the age of Twitter, a social network that keeps users in constant streaming contact with one another, what is cheating

Why does the author cite the example of Stanford University Design School

患者，女，28岁，已婚。月经延后而至，量少。色黯红，少腹疼痛，拒按，喜热，舌黯苔薄白，脉弦涩，其治法是（）

A.益气养血，活血调经

B.扶阳祛寒，养血调经

C.温经散寒，活血调经

D.理气行滞，活血调经

E.温经养血，暖宫调经

财政部应当自全国人民代表大会批准中央预算之日起( )日内，批复中央各部门预算。

A．10
B．15
C．20
D．30

为了防止羰基镍的生成，一般在（）过程中严格遵守操作规程。

A.正常操作

B.开车

C.降温冷却

D.开车升温