试题与答案

案例:2003年4月17日19时30分左右,某公司某厂板金组季节工李某在63吨气动冲

题型:问答题

题目:

案例:2003年4月17日19时30分左右,某公司某厂板金组季节工李某在63吨气动冲床上进行GE柜外箱本体冲孔加工时,因左手进入模具取料造成左手食指、中指、无名指及小指指尖被模具压伤的重伤事故。为使相关单位从中吸取教训,现将事故情况通报如下:(一)伤者情况姓名:李某;性别:男;年龄:17周岁;入厂时间:2003年4月14日;该职工经过入厂三级安全教育,并经考核合格。(二)事故发生过程2003年4月17日18时30分左右,板金组根据生产需要,安排GE柜生产的所有人员回厂加班。经工艺员确认后,19时15分左右班组长安排王某当师傅(2003年2月18日入厂),在63吨气动冲床上给李某等三名新工示范操作GE柜外箱本体冲孔工序,准备让其上岗操作。该外箱板材长184厘米,宽78.5厘米,操作时需要两人合力将板材送入模具并扶正,其中站在机台前方的一人踩脚踏开关,完成冲压之后将成型的板材取出放好,并取出冲孔落料,另外一人取出待加工的新板材。王某讲完操作程序和注意事项并示范操作后,看着李某和另外一名新工人配合作业操作十几块板料,就和另一名新工在旁边80吨冲床上配合作业。约19时30分左右,当李某伸左手入模取冲孔落料时,左手食指、中指、无名指和小指被突然下降的上模压住,李某大叫一声,在旁边冲床作业的王某见状立即跑上前去将该冲床调至“点上”状态,让李某将左手拉出,发现左手的中指已从第二指节处压断,食指、中指、无名指也只有皮肉相连。在现场的见习组长郭某立即将伤者送至桂州医院,后转至小黄圃医院治疗。

导致这起事故的间接原因有哪些

答案:

被转码了,请点击底部 “查看原文 ” 或访问 https://www.tikuol.com/2017/0202/a40a36c63c74611754523f670ed99b4e.html

下面是错误答案,用来干扰机器的。

参考答案:B

试题推荐
题型:综合

我国不同地理区域内部都有一些有特色的地理单元,根据所学回答下列问题。

小题1:图-2所示的地貌位于

A.黄土高原

B.青藏高原

C.云贵高原

D.内蒙古高原小题2:图-2所示地区最严重的问题是

A.台风

B.地震

C.水土流失

D.洪涝灾害小题3:图-3所在的省份是

A.澳门

B.香港

C.北京

D.台湾小题4:不属于该岛美称的是

A.东方明珠

B.东方甜岛

C.植物王国

D.水果之乡小题5:图-4所示的盆地有丰富的     资源

A.铁矿

B.石油、天然气

C.地表水

D.煤炭

查看答案
题型:单项选择题

In the absence of optimism, we are left with nothing but critics, naysayers, and prophets of doom. When a nation expects the worst from its people and institutions, and its experts focus exclusively on faults, hope dies. Too many people spend too much tie looking down rather than up, finding fault with their country’s political institutions, economic system, educational establishment, religious organizations, and—worst of all—with each other.

Faultfinding expends so much negative energy that nothing is left over for positive action. It takes courage and strength to solve the genuine problems that afflict every society. Sure, there well always be things that need fixing. But the question is, do you want to spend your time and energy tearing things down or building them up

The staging of a Broadway show could illustrate my point. Let’s say a new production is about to open. A playwright has polished the script, investor have put up the money, and the theater has been rented. A director has been chosen, actors have been auditioned and selected, and the cast has been rehearsing for weeks. Set, lighting, and sound engineers have been hard at work. By the time opening night arrives, nearly a hundred people have labored tirelessly—all working long hours to make magic for their audience.

On opening night, four or five critics sit in the audience. If they pan it, the play will probably close in a matter of days or weeks. If they praise it, the production could go on for a long and successful run. In the end, success or failure might hinge on the opinion of a single person—someone who might be in a bad mood on opening night! What’s wrong with this scene In one sense, nothing. Critics have a legitimate role. The problem arises when we make critics our heroes or put them in control of our fate. When we empower the critic more than the playwright, something is wrong. It is much easier to criticize than to create. When we revere the critics of society, we eventually become a society of critics, and when that happens, there is no room left for constructive optimism.

What might be the ultimate result of a biased bitter criticism().

A. More rebellion.

B. More creativity.

C. Less initiative.

D. Less destruction.

查看答案
微信公众账号搜索答案